AFP

DR Congo Pygmies attacked in wildlife park: rights group

Troops and rangers in the Kahuzi-Biega National Park in eastern DR Congo have carried out attacks on indigenous Pygmies living in the famed wildlife haven, a rights watchdog said on Wednesday

Violence broke out in 2018 between park rangers and members of the Batwa community, who are accused of illegally settling in the reserve, cutting down trees to make charcoal and opening fire on rangers, killing and wounding a number of them.

The British watchdog Minority Rights Group (MRG), in a report on Wednesday, alleged that soldiers and Kahuzi-Biega guards carried out attacks against the Pygmies living in the park. 

“The attacks were well-planned, targeted civilian populations,” the group said.

“The research team obtained direct evidence of the deaths of at least 20 individual Batwa community members in connection with this three-year campaign of forced expulsion,” it added.

“The research team obtained direct evidence that 15 Batwa women were forcibly group-raped by park guards and soldiers during the July and November-December 2021 operations,” the watchdog said.

The 6,000-square-kilometre (2,300-square-mile mile) reserve lies close to the Rwandan border near Bukavu, in one of the most troubled areas of the vast country.

– Legal limbo –

Dominated by the extinct volcanoes of Kahuzi and Biega, the park’s tropical forests are a redoubt for one of the last populations of eastern lowland gorillas, made up of about 250 primates, according to its website.

Since the 1990s, the haven has been listed by UNESCO as a World Heritage site in danger because of the presence of armed groups and settlers, poaching and deforestation.

A number of Pygmies charge that their land was confiscated when the national park was expanded and want to recover what they say is theirs.

The MRG report, based on on-site investigation and dozens of witnesses, said the park rangers received financial and technical support at the time from the governments of Germany and the United States, as well as international conservation organizations such as the Wildlife Conservation Society.

An investigation has recently been launched by the park’s overseers, the Congolese Institute for the Conservation of Nature (ICCN), to probe alleged violations.

The panel has been in Bukavu since April 4 and will travel to the scene of the alleged crimes, Georges Muzibaziba, who heads the ICCN’s human rights section.

There is a lack of legal clarity between DR Congo’s laws that protect the national park and those guaranteeing the rights of the Pygmy populations. 

On April 7, 2021, a bill to protect and promote the rights of indigenous people was adopted by the DR Congo parliament.

It guarantees among other things recognition of the rights to land and natural resources of the indigenous Pygmy people to possess, occupy and use traditionally.

The Senate has been reviewing the bill for the last year.

NASA delays final test for moon shot

The latest test of NASA’s giant Moon rocket SLS has been suspended to allow for a SpaceX rocket to launch later this week, the US space agency announced Tuesday.

The dress rehearsal for the giant Space Launch System is taking at launch pad 39B at Cape Canaveral, Florida — where SpaceX is scheduled to lift off from pad 39A on Friday.

The test of the rocket, which is to return humans to the Moon, is now expected to resume shortly after the take-off of the SpaceX flight, which is to carry three businessmen and a former astronaut to the International Space Station. 

The 322-foot (98 meters) SLS rocket will remain on its launch pad while waiting.

In this final test before blast-off for the Moon later this year, all the steps leading up to launch must be rehearsed, from filling the tanks to the final countdown, which will be stopped just before the engines fire. 

The run-through started last Friday and was originally scheduled to last two days, but was extended after NASA teams encountered “a whole myriad of technical challenges” as well as uncooperative weather on Saturday, said Mike Sarafin, the mission manager for the Artemis Moon landing.

Among the problems encountered were four lightning strikes hitting the launch pad during a thunderstorm, which at least proved that the protection system had worked as planned. 

But the problems were not “major issues,” Sarafin said. “We haven’t run into any fundamental design flaws or design issues.”

“We take pride in learning from these tests,” he said, calling the ones already carried out in recent days “partially successful.” 

Artemis 1 will mark the first flight of the SLS, whose development has lagged years behind schedule. 

The Orion capsule at its top will be propelled to the Moon, where it will be placed in orbit before returning to Earth. 

The first mission will not have astronauts on board. The take-off date is to be announced after the so-called “wet” dress rehearsal. 

A launch window is possible in early June, and Sarafin said he was “not ready to give up on it yet.” 

Another launch window is possible in early July.

Good times: Luxury watchmakers face soaring demand

Times have been so good for luxury watchmakers that they are running behind demand, forcing some to delay the release of new collections and others to invest more in production capacity.

After the pandemic severely hit the global economy in 2020, the sector enjoyed a spectacular recovery last year and started 2022 with a bang, though Russia’s war in Ukraine created new uncertainties.

Watches were the best performing business for French luxury group Hermes, with sales soaring by 73 percent last year.

“We had an extraordinary year in the watches business,” Hermes vice president Guillaume de Seynes told AFP at Watches and Wonders in Geneva this week, one of the industry’s biggest annual showcases.

“We can feel a very strong dynamic for watchmaking everywhere in the world,” he said, adding that there was hot demand for a men’s watch model last year.

“We could have even sold more if we had been able to make more,” de Seynes said, noting that watchmakers face a “demand phenomenon that exceeds production capacity.”

His priority for 2022 is to invest in production. 

– Solid year –

The Oris brand also had “a very strong year”, said its chief executive, Rolf Studer.

Oris watches range between 1,800 and 7,200 Swiss francs ($1,928 and $7,710 or 1,767 euros and 7,064 euros).

The company had to delay the launch of a new collection in the higher price range because it did not produce enough watch movements — their internal mechanisms — in its workshops.

The watch was supposed to come out last summer but it is only launching now.

“We planned too conservatively,” Studer said.

“So we decided to keep the movements for the watches that were already out instead of launching new models and not be able to supply existing models already on the market,” he added.

Swiss watch exports rebounded last year, rising by 31.2 percent after a 21.8-percent contraction in 2020, when countries closed borders and went into strict Covid lockdowns.

Exports have not only exceeded pre-pandemic levels, they beat their 2014 record, too.

They went up by almost 16 percent in the first two months of this year, according to industry data, though the recovery has been seen only in watches worth more than 3,000 Swiss francs.

– Wait list –

The sector is now bracing for the fallout from the war in Ukraine and sanctions on Russia, which has a sizeable rich client base.

But the industry can rely on long wait lists for higher-end timepieces.

“Since we didn’t have enough watches for other markets, we will sell those that won’t be delivered to Russia elsewhere,” Edouard Meylan, CEO of H. Moser & Cie., told AFP.

All of his 2022 production is already pre-sold to retailers and partly pre-paid by final customers.

H. Moser only makes 2,000 watches per year at an average price of 45,000 Swiss francs. The watchmaker is even rejecting orders for timepieces that require a more than two-year wait.

“There’s uncertainty that can be created in other markets, particularly financial markets,” Meylan said.

“But we would have to have a big crash for an independent brand like ours to be affected,” he added.

'TikTok is having a bad war,' say disinformation experts

The war in Ukraine has rapidly positioned TikTok as the number one source of misinformation thanks to its gigantic number of users and minimal filtering of content, experts say. 

Every day, Shayan Sardarizadeh, a journalist with the BBC’s disinformation team, ploughs through a hallucinatory mix of fake and misleading information about the war being spewed out on the video-sharing site. 

“TikTok is really not having a good war,” he told AFP.

“I haven’t seen another platform with so much false content,” he added. 

“We’ve seen it all: videos from past conflicts being recycled, genuine footage presented in a misleading way, things that are so obviously false but still get tens of millions of views.”

He said the most disturbing were fake live-streams in which users pretended to be on the ground in Ukraine but were using footage from other conflicts or even video games — and then asking for money to support their “reporting”. 

“Millions tune in and watch. They even add fake gunshots and explosions,” said Sardarizadeh.

Anastasiya Zhyrmont of Access Now, an advocacy group, said it was no excuse to say that the war came as a surprise. 

“This conflict has been escalating since 2014 and these problems of Kremlin propaganda and misinformation have been raised with TikTok long before the invasion,” she told AFP. 

“They’ve promised to double their efforts and partner with content checkers, but I’m not sure they are taking this obligation seriously,” she added. 

– ‘No context’ –

Zhyrmont said the problem may lie with the lack of Ukrainian language content moderators, making it trickier for TikTok to spot false information. 

TikTok told AFP that it has Russian and Ukrainian speakers, but did not say how many, and said it had added resources specifically focused on the war but did not provide details. 

AFP is a partner of TikTok, providing fact-checking services in Australia, Indonesia, New Zealand, Pakistan and the Philippines. 

Some say the very nature of TikTok makes it problematic when subject matter becomes more serious than funny skits and dance routines. 

“The way you consume information on TikTok — scrolling from one video to another really quickly — means there is no context on any given piece of content,” said Chine Labbe of NewsGuard, which tracks online misinformation. 

NewsGuard ran an experiment to see how long it would take for new users to start receiving false information if they lingered on videos about the war. 

The answer was 40 minutes. 

“NewsGuard’s findings add to the body of evidence that TikTok’s lack of effective content-labelling and moderation, coupled with its skill at pushing users to content that keeps them on the app, have made the platform fertile ground for the spread of disinformation,” it concluded in its report. 

TikTok recognises the problem. 

In a blog post on March 4, it said it was using “a combination of technology and people to protect our platform” and partnering with independent fact-checkers to provide more context. 

– ‘Really troubling’ –

In the meantime, the particular concern with TikTok is the age of its users: a third in the United States, for example, are 19 or younger. 

“It’s hard enough for adults to decipher the real from the propaganda in Ukraine. For a young user to be fed all this false information is really troubling,” said Labbe.

All those interviewed emphasised that misinformation is rampant across all social media, but that TikTok had done even less than Facebook, Instagram or Twitter to combat it. 

TikTok’s relative infancy also means its own users have not yet joined the fight as they have on other platforms. 

“There are communities on Twitter and Instagram who are involved in disinformation,” said Sardarizadeh. 

“Some are starting to do fact-checking and educate people on TikTok, but we’re talking about a dozen or two dozen, compared with hundreds on Twitter.”

World stock markets beat retreat with all eyes on Fed

Global equities sank Wednesday on bets the Federal Reserve will act more aggressively to bring inflation under control, while oil prices rebounded.

Asian and European bourses retreated after heavy falls on Wall Street Tuesday.

The euro hit a one-month dollar low before minutes from the Fed’s latest policy meeting due Wednesday.

London stocks slid also as UK businesses and individuals saw a major tax hike kick in, worsening Britain’s cost-of-living crisis as domestic energy bills rocket.

Minutes from the Fed’s March meeting will be pored over for insights into the thinking of US central bankers, in light of the Ukraine war and recent data suggesting the world’s top economy remains resilient.

– ‘Significant headwinds’ –

“Investor confidence might have improved from the low point in early March when the Ukraine war was unfolding,” said AJ Bell investment director Russ Mould. 

“However, there remain significant headwinds for equities and the latest trouble spot is what the Federal Reserve might do to curb inflation.”

Investors are fretting also over how quickly officials will withdraw their vast pandemic-era financial support.

After last month’s 0.25-percentage-point hike in US interest rates, the focus is now on its plans for May’s meeting, with expectations growing that the Fed will announce a 0.50-point lift followed by several more before the end of the year.

Fed governor Lael Brainard, who is considered a dove, on Tuesday spooked traders by saying bringing US inflation down from 40-year highs was of “paramount importance” and that the bank was “prepared to take stronger action” if warranted.

Brainard also said bank policymakers were ready to start reducing its vast bond holdings, which have helped keep borrowing costs down.

“Brainard’s hawkish comments rocked the markets,” said Swissquote analyst Ipek Ozkardeskaya.

“In this tense environment, investors will be closely watching the Fed minutes today. There would be no surprise if the Fed hinted a 50-basis-point hike (for) the next meeting,” she noted.

All three main indices on Wall Street ended Tuesday in the red, with the Nasdaq off more than two percent owing to tech firms being more susceptible to higher rates.

– Oil rebounds –

Oil prices rebounded on Wednesday, after European Council chief Charles Michel told the European Parliament that it must impose oil and gas sanctions on Russia “sooner or later”.

Crude futures had slid the previous day on the European Union’s decision not to include Russian oil in a fresh round of sanctions.

Adding to downward pressure on crude is a strong dollar thanks to the prospect of a series of US interest rate hikes. 

Oil is priced in dollars, making it more expensive for clients using other currencies.

– Key figures around 1030 GMT –

London – FTSE 100: DOWN 0.5 percent at 7,577.10 points

Frankfurt – DAX: DOWN 1.3 percent at 14,230.52

Paris – CAC 40: DOWN 1.2 percent at 6,564.72

EURO STOXX 50: DOWN 1.5 percent at 3,858.21

Tokyo – Nikkei 225: DOWN 1.9 percent at 27,080.52 (close)

Hong Kong – Hang Seng Index: DOWN 1.3 percent at 22,219.85 (close)

Shanghai – Composite: FLAT at 3,283.43 (close)

New York – Dow: DOWN 0.8 percent at 34,641.18 (close)

Brent North Sea crude: UP 1.5 percent at $108.24 per barrel

West Texas Intermediate: UP 1.8 percent at $103.78 per barrel

Euro/dollar: DOWN at $1.0903 from $1.0905 late Tuesday

Pound/dollar: UP at $1.3080 from $1.3074

Euro/pound: DOWN at 83.37 pence from 83.41 pence

Dollar/yen: UP at 123.96 yen from 123.60 yen

burs-rfj/bcp/lth

Asian, European markets track Wall St retreat on hawkish Fed bets

Equities sank Wednesday after Wall Street tumbled on bets the Federal Reserve will act more aggressively to bring inflation under control, while oil recovered some losses caused by the European Union’s decision not to ban Russian crude.

While the Ukraine war continues to cast a shadow across trading floors, Fed monetary policy is at the top of the agenda this week as investors fret over how quickly officials will withdraw their vast pandemic-era financial support.

After last month’s 0.25-percentage-point hike in interest rates, the focus is now on its plans for May’s meeting, with expectations growing that it will announce a 0.50-point lift followed by several more before the end of the year.

Fed governor Lael Brainard, who is considered a dove, on Tuesday spooked traders by saying bringing inflation down from 40-year highs was of “paramount importance” and that the bank was “prepared to take stronger action” if warranted.

Brainard, who is awaiting congressional confirmation for the position of Fed vice chair, also said bank policymakers were ready to start reducing its vast bond holdings, which have helped keep borrowing costs down.

“The market might have been looking for… Brainard to at least give more balanced remarks — instead, they were at the hawkish end of the spectrum from someone like Brainard,” said Stephen Innes of SPI Asset Management.

“She was not overly hawkish, but neither did she offer anything for the doves to cling to.”

Michael Hewson at CMC Markets added that Brainard’s comments, and those from Mary Daly of the San Francisco Fed, “put into sharp relief the concerns investors have, that in looking to rein back inflation, the Fed might overplay its hand and tighten too aggressively and tip the economy into recession”.

Minutes from the Fed’s March meeting will be released later in the day and will be pored over for insights into officials’ thinking, in light of the war and recent data suggesting the world’s top economy remains resilient for now.

All three main indexes on Wall Street ended in the red, with the Nasdaq off more than two percent owing to tech firms being more susceptible to higher rates.

And the selling seeped through to Asia.

Hong Kong and mainland Chinese investors returned from a break to data indicating a sharp drop in China’s services sector caused by the imposition of lockdowns around the country including Shanghai, its biggest city.

Hong Kong dropped more than one percent but Shanghai recovered from early selling to end marginally higher.

Tokyo, Sydney, Seoul, Singapore, Mumbai, Manila, Jakarta, Bangkok and Wellington also retreated.

London, Paris and Frankfurt opened lower.

“Liquidity remains poor, and no one seems willing to take the other side as air pockets are becoming easier to find these days,” Innes added.

The European Union’s decision not to include Russian oil in a fresh round of sanctions saw both main contracts drop Tuesday and extend losses in early Asian business.

The reliance of the bloc — and particularly Germany — on crude from Russia has kept it from following the United States and Britain in imposing an embargo, though it signalled it wants to hit the country’s coal and shipping.

However, European Council chief Charles Michel told the European Parliament on Wednesday that it must impose oil and gas sanctions “sooner or later”.

Adding to downward pressure on crude is the stronger dollar, which jumped in reaction to Brainard’s comments. Oil is priced in dollars, making it more expensive for clients using other currencies.

A coordinated move by Washington, Brussels and the G7 could also ban “all” new investments in Russia on Wednesday, while the US Treasury said Washington has barred Moscow from making debt payments using funds held at American banks.

Meanwhile, the Asian Development Bank lowered its 2022 growth forecast for developing Asia owing to “increasing” price pressures caused by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, offsetting the recovery from Covid-19.

“The Ukraine crisis is nowhere near to being resolved,” Amy Wu Silverman, at RBC Capital Markets LLC, told Bloomberg Television. “And then we’re heading into earnings season. Volatility levels are probably too low and will start to pick up.”

– Key figures around 0720 GMT –

Tokyo – Nikkei 225: DOWN 1.6 percent at 27,350.30 (close)

Hong Kong – Hang Seng Index: DOWN 1.3 percent at 22,219.85

Shanghai – Composite: FLAT at 3,283.43 (close)

London – FTSE 100: DOWN 0.2 percent at 7,599.04

Brent North Sea crude: UP 0.5 percent at $107.19 per barrel

West Texas Intermediate: UP 0.3 percent at $102.21 per barrel

Dollar/yen: UP at 123.93 yen from 123.60 yen late Tuesday

Euro/dollar: DOWN at $1.0892 from $1.0903

Pound/dollar: DOWN at $1.3067 from $1.3071

Euro/pound: DOWN at 83.35 pence from 83.38 pence

New York – Dow: DOWN 0.8 percent at 34,641.18 (close)

'TikTok is having a bad war,' say disinformation experts

The war in Ukraine has rapidly positioned TikTok as the number one source of misinformation thanks to its gigantic number of users and minimal filtering of content, experts say. 

Every day, Shayan Sardarizadeh, a journalist with the BBC’s disinformation team, ploughs through a hallucinatory mix of fake and misleading information about the war being spewed out on the video-sharing site. 

“TikTok is really not having a good war,” he told AFP.

“I haven’t seen another platform with so much false content,” he added. 

“We’ve seen it all: videos from past conflicts being recycled, genuine footage presented in a misleading way, things that are so obviously false but still get tens of millions of views.”

He said the most disturbing were fake live-streams in which users pretended to be on the ground in Ukraine, but were actually using footage from other conflicts or even video games — and then asking for money to support their “reporting”. 

“Millions tune in and watch. They even add fake gunshots and explosions,” said Sardarizadeh.

Anastasiya Zhyrmont of Access Now, an advocacy group, said it was no excuse to say that the war came as a surprise. 

“This conflict has been escalating since 2014 and these problems of Kremlin propaganda and misinformation have been raised with TikTok long before the invasion,” she told AFP. 

“They’ve promised to double their efforts and partner with content checkers, but I’m not sure they are taking this obligation seriously,” she added. 

– ‘No context’ –

Zhyrmont said the problem may lie with the lack of Ukrainian language content moderators, making it trickier for TikTok to spot false information. 

TikTok told AFP that it has Russian and Ukrainian speakers, but did not say how many, and said it had added resources specifically focused on the war, but did not provide details. 

But some say the very nature of TikTok makes it problematic when subject matter becomes more serious than funny skits and dance routines. 

“The way you consume information on TikTok — scrolling from one video to another really quickly — means there is no context on any given piece of content,” said Chine Labbe of NewsGuard, which tracks online misinformation. 

NewsGuard ran an experiment to see how long it would take for new users to start receiving false information if they lingered on videos about the war. 

The answer was 40 minutes. 

“NewsGuard’s findings add to the body of evidence that TikTok’s lack of effective content-labelling and moderation, coupled with its skill at pushing users to content that keeps them on the app, have made the platform fertile ground for the spread of disinformation,” it concluded in its report. 

TikTok recognises the problem. 

In a blog post on March 4, it said it was using “a combination of technology and people to protect our platform” and partnering with independent fact-checkers to provide more context. 

– ‘Really troubling’ –

In the meantime, the particular concern with TikTok is the age of its users: a third in the United States, for example, are 19 or younger. 

“It’s hard enough for adults to decipher the real from the propaganda in Ukraine. For a young user to be fed all this false information is really troubling,” said Labbe.

All those interviewed emphasised that misinformation is rampant across all social media, but that TikTok had done even less than Facebook, Instagram or Twitter to combat it. 

TikTok’s relative infancy also means its own users have not yet joined the fight as they have on other platforms. 

“There are communities on Twitter and Instagram who are involved in disinformation,” said Sardarizadeh. 

“Some are starting to do fact-checking and educate people on TikTok, but we’re talking about a dozen or two dozen, compared with hundreds on Twitter.”

Russian cinema in turmoil as Hollywood pulls out

After years spent translating Hollywood films, Russian Mila Grekova was suddenly thrown out of work after Moscow’s military intervention in Ukraine.

Five Hollywood giants — Disney, Warner Bros, Universal, Sony Pictures and Paramount — have all stopped releasing new films there, leaving Russian cinemas bereft of the latest blockbusters.

But it has not made Grekova turn against President Vladimir Putin.

“It’s the West that I hate today and not Putin,” the 56-year-old said.

“Bollywood may replace Hollywood in Russia, but it’s too late for me to learn Hindi,” she said, referring to India’s refusal to condemn Moscow or join in with sanctions.

Russia’s film industry has been thrown into turmoil by the fighting in Ukraine just as it was beginning to recover from the pandemic.

And like in many sectors hit by sanctions, the film industry is turning away from the West, looking inward to its own movies or east to Asia.

Russians are avid cinema-goers with the highest number of admission in Europe, 145.7 million last year, according to the European Audiovisual Observatory. 

Many flock to see Hollywood films, which are often dubbed instead of being shown with subtitles. 

– Looking to Asia –

Before Hollywood’s withdrawal, Russian company Mosfilm-Master was dubbing around 10 foreign films a month, mostly from English.

“Now we have lost two thirds” of business, the company’s director Yevgeny Belin told AFP in its high-tech dubbing studio in Moscow.

“During the pandemic, we had films but no cinemas open. Today, we have our cinemas but no films,” he said.

Russia’s National Association of Cinema Owners said last month that cinemas risk losing up to 80 percent of their revenue.

Looking to adapt, Mosfilm-Master is on the hunt for translators from Korean and Mandarin, even though Belin said he “doubts that Asian films work for Russians” because of cultural differences. 

“Westerners are closer to us,” said the 70-year-old, who has spent three decades in dubbing. 

Olga Zinyakova, the president of Karo, one of Russia’s leading cinema chains, said she is confident the industry can rebuild.

“The situation is extremely difficult but not catastrophic,” the 37-year-old said.

“Since the arrival of Hollywood in post-Soviet Russia 30 years ago, we have gone through a lot of crises: political, economic and the pandemic,” she said, surrounded by empty seats in Moscow’s Oktyabr cinema, home to Europe’s largest screening room with 1,500 places.

– Russian identity –

Since the conflict began on February 24, the number of tickets sold in Karo’s 35 cinemas has fallen by 70 percent, Zinyakova said.

The Russian government has promised major financial support and tax breaks to film production and cinemas, as it looks to replace Hollywood films with more homegrown fare.

“Russians will explore themselves more deeply,” said Zinyakova, pointing to the success of Russian films from the 1990s like the cult movie “Brat” (“Brother”) which is screening again in several Moscow cinemas.

Zinyakova is also preparing to include more Asian and Latin American films among upcoming releases. 

“And when Hollywood comes back, the Russian market and viewers will no longer be the same,” she said.

Pavel Doreuli, a 44-year-old sound designer who works on around 15 Russian films a year, said it was no surprise that Hollywood has pulled out of Russia. 

“World cinema has been hostage to big politics for years,” he said, saying major film festivals like Cannes and Berlin were no longer about art, but about promoting “certain values”.

Still, Doreuli said it would be a shame for Russia to be cut off from world cinema, pointing to the exclusion of official Russian delegations from this year’s Cannes film festival.

“If they are excluded from international festivals, Russians will give up on arthouse cinema that offers a different vision of the world, which is so precious today,” he said.

Twitter to test longed-for edit button

Twitter announced Tuesday it will soon start experimenting with an edit button, but only on its monthly subscription service at first.

The inability to tweak tweets after firing them off has been a key complaint among users of the one-to-many messaging platform.

Word that the company would start testing an edit feature on Twitter Blue came after newly-named board member Elon Musk conducted an online poll.

In a tweet, Musk asked if people wanted an edit button at Twitter. Nearly 4.4 million votes were cast, some 73 percent of them saying “yes.”

“Now that everyone is asking… yes, we’ve been working on an edit feature since last year,” Twitter posted on its communications account.

“No, we didn’t get the idea from a poll,” it added, poking fun at the Tesla boss.

According to Jay Sullivan, the company’s head of consumer product, “Edit” has been the most requested Twitter feature “for many years.”

“People want to be able to fix (sometimes embarrassing) mistakes, typos and hot takes in the moment. They currently work around this by deleting and tweeting again,” Sullivan said in a tweet-thread.

The San Francisco-based internet firm said it will kick off testing in coming months to figure out what works when it comes to letting users tinker with posts after they have gone live.

Twitter Blue lets people pay a monthly subscription fee of $3 to access special content or features.

Blue is available on the Twitter application for Apple or Android smartphones in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States, according to the company.

Twitter also announced Tuesday that Musk will join its board, boosting hopes the eccentric entrepreneur will lift the social media company’s prospects — although some observers expressed wariness of the billionaire’s influence.

Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal called Musk “a passionate believer and intense critic of the service which is exactly what we need,” while Musk said he looked forward to soon making “significant improvements to Twitter.”

Musk, who also leads the SpaceX venture and is the world’s richest man, on Monday had announced his purchase of 73.5 million Twitter shares, or 9.2 percent of the company’s common stock.

Jack Dorsey, the co-founder of Twitter who stepped down as CEO last year, had long opposed an “edit” button on the basis that users could change a tweet that had already been widely shared, changing its meaning or context.

Sullivan addressed those concerns in his posts.

“Without things like time limits, controls, and transparency about what has been edited, Edit could be misused to alter the record of the public conversation,” he said, adding that that company’s top priority is “protecting the integrity of that public conversation.”

He noted that “it will take time” to develop the “Edit” feature and the company will be “actively seeking input and adversarial thinking” in advance of its launch.

Asian markets track Wall St retreat on hawkish Fed bets

Equities sank Wednesday after Wall Street tumbled on bets the Federal Reserve will act more aggressively to bring inflation under control, while oil prices extended losses after the European Union refrained from imposing sanctions on Russian crude.

While the Ukraine war continues to cast a shadow across trading floors, Fed monetary policy is at the top of the agenda this week as investors fret over how quickly officials will withdraw their vast pandemic-era financial support.

After last month’s 0.25 percentage point hike in interest rates, the focus is now on its plans for May’s meeting, with expectations growing that it will announce a 0.50 point lift followed by several more before the end of the year.

Fed governor Lael Brainard, who is considered a dove, on Tuesday spooked traders by saying bringing inflation down from 40-year highs was of “paramount importance” and that the bank was “prepared to take stronger action” if warranted.

Brainard, who is awaiting congressional confirmation for the position of Fed vice chair, also said bank policymakers were ready to start reducing its vast bond holdings, which have helped keep borrowing costs down.

“The market might have been looking for… Brainard to at least give more balanced remarks — instead, they were at the hawkish end of the spectrum from someone like Brainard,” said Stephen Innes of SPI Asset Management.

“She was not overly hawkish, but neither did she offer anything for the doves to cling to.”

Minutes from the Fed’s March meeting will be released later in the day and will be pored over for insights into officials’ thinking in light of the war and recent data suggesting the world’s top economy remains resilient for now.

All three main indexes on Wall Street ended in the red, with the Nasdaq off more than two percent owing to tech firms being more susceptible to higher rates.

And the selling seeped through to Asia, where Hong Kong, Shanghai and Taipei dropped on their return from a break.

Tokyo, Sydney, Seoul, Singapore, Manila, Jakarta and Wellington also retreated.

“Liquidity remains poor, and no one seems willing to take the other side as air pockets are becoming easier to find these days,” Innes added.

The European Union’s decision not to include Russian oil in a fresh round of sanctions saw both main contracts drop Tuesday and extend losses in early Asian business.

The reliance of the bloc — and particularly Germany — on crude from Russia has kept it from following the United States and Britain in imposing an embargo, though it signalled it wants to hit the country’s coal and shipping.

Adding to downward pressure on crude is the stronger dollar, which jumped in reaction to Brainard’s comments. Oil is priced in dollars, making it more expensive for clients using other currencies.

A coordinated move by Washington, Brussels and the G7 could also ban “all” new investments in Russia on Wednesday, while the US Treasury said Washington has barred Moscow from making debt payments using funds held at American banks.

Meanwhile, the Asian Development Bank lowered its 2022 growth forecast for developing Asia owing to “increasing” price pressures caused by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, offsetting the recovery from Covid-19.

– Key figures around 0230 GMT –

Tokyo – Nikkei 225: DOWN 1.9 percent at 27,262.05 (break)

Hong Kong – Hang Seng Index: DOWN 1.8 percent at 22,106.00

Shanghai – Composite: DOWN 0.7 percent at 3,261.22

Brent North Sea crude: DOWN 0.2 percent at $106.44 per barrel

West Texas Intermediate: DOWN 0.3 percent at $101.68 per barrel

Dollar/yen: UP at 124.00 yen from 123.60 yen late Tuesday

Euro/dollar: DOWN at $1.0895 from $1.0903

Pound/dollar: DOWN at $1.3069 from $1.3071

Euro/pound: DOWN at 83.35 pence from 83.38 pence

New York – Dow: DOWN 0.8 percent at 34,641.18 (close)

London – FTSE 100: UP 0.7 percent at 7,613.72 (close) 

Close Bitnami banner
Bitnami