AFP

Bringing down inflation will take time, more rate hikes: Fed officials

The United States will require further interest rate hikes in order to cool the world’s largest economy and rein in high prices, Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook said Thursday.

As US annual inflation has soared to the fastest in 40 years, the Fed has moved aggressively this year to tamp down demand, raising the interest rates five times, for a total of three percentage points.

And the central bank has said more increases are likely to come this year.

“Inflation remains stubbornly and unacceptably high, and data over the past few months show that inflationary pressures remain broad-based,” Cook said in her first speech as a member of the US central bank’s board.

Prices have surged over the past year, partly due to global supply chain problems that created shortages of key parts such as semiconductors needed for cars and electronics, as well as a shortage of workers.

The situation was exacerbated with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February — spurring a surge in energy prices and affecting global food markets — along with China’s adherence to a strict zero-Covid policy.

While the Fed cannot act directly on supply, it can moderate demand by tightening monetary policy, Cook said in the appearance at the Peterson Institute for International Economics.

“We will keep at it until the job is done,” she said.

– No ‘meaningful progress’ –

Her fellow Fed board member Christopher Waller warned that given ongoing price pressures, including from the US housing market, inflation is “not likely to fall quickly.”

“We haven’t yet made meaningful progress on inflation, and until that progress is both meaningful and persistent, I support continued rate increases,” Waller said in a speech Thursday.

Both officials expressed concern about the widespread and persistent forces pushing up prices and said the Fed must remain focused on that threat.

“Restoring price stability likely will require ongoing rate hikes and then keeping policy restrictive for some time until we are confident that inflation is firmly on the path toward our two percent goal,” Cook said.

Waller said that in addition to likely increases in November and December, “I anticipate additional rate hikes into early next year.”

He also downplayed speculation that sharp movements in financial markets might cause the Fed to ease off its aggressive stance.

“This is not something I’m considering or believe to be a very likely development,” he said, noting that “markets are operating effectively” and the Fed has tools to address any strains.

Stocks mostly retreat, pound drops

Global equity markets mostly fell Thursday and the pound retreated once more against the dollar ahead of key US jobs data as IMF chief Kristalina Georgieva warned of rising global recession risks.

Oil prices advanced, building on gains made before OPEC and other major producers led by Russia decided to slash output by two million barrels a day.

OANDA market analyst Craig Erlam said European markets erased early gains as “investors take a cautious approach” ahead of Friday’s release of the critical US jobs report that could influence the Federal Reserve’s next move.

Wall Street also endured a dreary session, with the S&P 500 losing one percent on worries that a better-than-expected employment data could send stocks lower due to expectations for more aggressive interest rate hikes.

“You’d have to be very courageous to make a big bet today before the jobs data,” said Gregori Volokhine of Meeschaert Financial Services. “Today people are playing the waiting game.”

Stocks snapped higher at the start of the week after disappointing US economic data fueled hopes of a moderation in the Fed’s efforts to counter inflation.

“The narrative in recent days of weaker data being positive as it could be a precursor to slower tightening didn’t seem sustainable and it’s already proving to be the case,” added Erlam.

Instead, he said he believed the rally to be a response to the sharp drop in shares in the previous weeks as the Fed made clear it would keep raising rates until inflation is brought down, even if that triggers a recession.

In a speech ahead of the IMF’s annual meetings next week, IMF chief Kristalina Georgieva urged policymakers to address rampant inflation.

She acknowledged that if central banks move too aggressively to tamp down price pressures, it could trigger a “prolonged” economic downturn.

But in an interview with AFP, she said policymakers “have to stay the course,” because right now “The risk of doing not enough is bigger than the risk of doing too much.”

– Oil prices steady –

Oil prices advanced further after the announcement from OPEC+ nations on the biggest reduction in output since the Covid-19 pandemic.

The move should support crude prices, but as high oil prices have been stoking the inflation that is driving central banks to raise interest rates, the move will further exacerbate the situation.

“The oil producing nations want to support the oil market, but a high oil price hurts most nations, so in a roundabout way, the move will probably add to global inflation,” said analyst David Madden at Equiti Capital.

The pound tumbled against the dollar after Fitch ratings agency lowered the outlook for British debt to negative from stable.

This comes after the government of new Prime Minister Liz Truss recently announced a budget packed with debt-fueled tax cuts.

“The large and unfunded fiscal package announced as part of the new government’s growth plan could lead to a significant increase in fiscal deficits over the medium term,” Fitch said in a statement.

“We consider that statements by the Chancellor (finance minister) hinting at the possibility of additional tax cuts and the likely modification of fiscal rules legislated in January reduce the predictability of fiscal policy.”

– Key figures around 2050 GMT –

New York – Dow: DOWN 1.2 percent at 29,926.94 (close)

New York – S&P 500: DOWN 1.0 percent at 3,744.52 (close)

New York – Nasdaq: DOWN 0.7 percent at 11,073.31 (close)

London – FTSE 100: DOWN 0.8 percent at 6,997.27 (close) 

Frankfurt – DAX: DOWN 0.4 percent at 12,470.78 (close)

Paris – CAC 40: DOWN 0.8 percent at 5,936.42 (close)

EURO STOXX 50: DOWN 0.4 percent at 3,433.45 (close)

Tokyo – Nikkei 225: UP 0.7 percent at 27,311.30 (close)

Hong Kong – Hang Seng Index: DOWN 0.4 percent at 18,012.15 (close)

Shanghai – Composite: Closed for a holiday

Pound/dollar: DOWN at $1.1161from $1.1326 on Wednesday

Euro/dollar: DOWN at $0.9794 from $0.9884

Euro/pound: UP at 87.74 pence from 87.27 pence

Dollar/yen: UP at 145.11 yen from 144.64 yen

Brent North Sea crude: UP 1.1 percent at $94.42 per barrel

West Texas Intermediate: UP 0.8 percent at $88.45 per barrel

burs-jmb

World Bank spent almost $15 bn on fossil fuel projects since Paris deal: report

The World Bank has pumped $14.8 billion into fossil fuel projects globally in the period following the landmark Paris climate accord, a report said Thursday.

Though the multilateral lender pledged in 2018 to end financing for upstream oil and gas, and direct funding had declined, the move failed to include indirect financing, according to the report compiled by an NGO coalition called The Big Shift Global.

It comes amid growing pressure on US President Joe Biden to fire World Bank chief David Malpass, a Trump appointee who has dodged questions about the reality of human-driven climate change.

“Each time the World Bank invests in another fossil fuel project, it fuels more climate disaster,” said Sophie Richmond of Big Shift. “There is no justification for using taxpayers’ money to exacerbate the climate crisis.”

One of the main ways the Bank continued to fund fossil fuels was by exploiting a “major loophole” by lending to intermediaries such as banks or financial institutions and by acting as a guarantor in case a country did not meet its obligations, the report said.

Under the 2015 Paris deal, world leaders committed to limiting long-term warming to 1.5 Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) to avert devastating outcomes for the planet’s future habitability. 

The biggest project listed in the report, called “Investing in Climate Disaster: World Bank Finance for Fossil Fuels,” was the Trans-Anatolian Pipeline in Azerbaijan, funded in 2018 to the tune of $1.1 billion, with the Bank acting as a guarantor. 

“It serves to perpetuate on-going use of fossil gas in Europe,” the report said, while noting that while the pipeline may increase gas export revenues, market volatility makes it an unreliable source of income.

The World Bank Group’s own assessment stated the project was “expected to have potentially significant adverse social and environmental impacts that are diverse, irreversible, or unprecedented” — but it gave a green light anyway.

– Coal plants –

Another project highlighted was the construction of two coal plants in Indonesia called Java 9 and 10, where the Bank supplied $65 million in indirect funds — despite the fact that the Java and Bali grid is already experiencing 40 percent oversupply of electricity.

“It is obvious that the new Java 9 & 10 coal-fired power plants will bring more disaster in terms of environmental, social and health issues, in an area already covered with coal plants and industries,” said Yuyun Indradi of Trend Asia, an NGO that promotes clean energy. 

The report’s authors also rejected the Bank’s treatment of natural gas as a “bridge” between fossil fuels and renewable energy, saying it crowded out needed investments in clean energy.

In a statement to AFP, the World Bank said, “We dispute the findings of the report: it makes inaccurate assumptions about the World Bank Group’s lending. 

“In fiscal year 2022, the Bank Group delivered a record $31.7 billion for climate-related investments, to help communities around the world respond to the climate crisis, and build a safer and cleaner future.”

A separate report published by Oxfam earlier this week said the World Bank “supplies very little evidence to support its claims about the amount of climate finance it provides,” leaving the public to take their figures “on faith.”

World Bank spent almost $15 bn on fossil fuel projects since Paris deal: report

The World Bank has pumped $14.8 billion into fossil fuel projects globally in the period following the landmark Paris climate accord, a report said Thursday.

Though the multilateral lender pledged in 2018 to end financing for upstream oil and gas, and direct funding had declined, the move failed to include indirect financing, according to the report compiled by an NGO coalition called The Big Shift Global.

It comes amid growing pressure on US President Joe Biden to fire World Bank chief David Malpass, a Trump appointee who has dodged questions about the reality of human-driven climate change.

“Each time the World Bank invests in another fossil fuel project, it fuels more climate disaster,” said Sophie Richmond of Big Shift. “There is no justification for using taxpayers’ money to exacerbate the climate crisis.”

One of the main ways the Bank continued to fund fossil fuels was by exploiting a “major loophole” by lending to intermediaries such as banks or financial institutions and by acting as a guarantor in case a country did not meet its obligations, the report said.

Under the 2015 Paris deal, world leaders committed to limiting long-term warming to 1.5 Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) to avert devastating outcomes for the planet’s future habitability. 

The biggest project listed in the report, called “Investing in Climate Disaster: World Bank Finance for Fossil Fuels,” was the Trans-Anatolian Pipeline in Azerbaijan, funded in 2018 to the tune of $1.1 billion, with the Bank acting as a guarantor. 

“It serves to perpetuate on-going use of fossil gas in Europe,” the report said, while noting that while the pipeline may increase gas export revenues, market volatility makes it an unreliable source of income.

The World Bank Group’s own assessment stated the project was “expected to have potentially significant adverse social and environmental impacts that are diverse, irreversible, or unprecedented” — but it gave a green light anyway.

– Coal plants –

Another project highlighted was the construction of two coal plants in Indonesia called Java 9 and 10, where the Bank supplied $65 million in indirect funds — despite the fact that the Java and Bali grid is already experiencing 40 percent oversupply of electricity.

“It is obvious that the new Java 9 & 10 coal-fired power plants will bring more disaster in terms of environmental, social and health issues, in an area already covered with coal plants and industries,” said Yuyun Indradi of Trend Asia, an NGO that promotes clean energy. 

The report’s authors also rejected the Bank’s treatment of natural gas as a “bridge” between fossil fuels and renewable energy, saying it crowded out needed investments in clean energy.

In a statement to AFP, the World Bank said, “We dispute the findings of the report: it makes inaccurate assumptions about the World Bank Group’s lending. 

“In fiscal year 2022, the Bank Group delivered a record $31.7 billion for climate-related investments, to help communities around the world respond to the climate crisis, and build a safer and cleaner future.”

A separate report published by Oxfam earlier this week said the World Bank “supplies very little evidence to support its claims about the amount of climate finance it provides,” leaving the public to take their figures “on faith.”

'Bad football' behind NFL parity, says Brady

Tom Brady believes “a lot of bad football” is behind an uneven start to the NFL season that has left just eight of 32 teams with winning records heading into week five of the campaign.

Brady’s Buccaneers are one of 15 teams with a 2-2 record after four games, which includes Tampa Bay’s opponents on Sunday, the Atlanta Falcons.

While the parity is no doubt partly down to NFL rules designed to ensure competitive balance year-after-year, seven-time Super Bowl champion Brady says it is more easily explained by a drop-off in quality.

“I think there’s a lot of bad football from what I watch,” Brady said.

“I’ve watched a lot of bad football, poor quality of football. That’s what I see,” the veteran quarterback added.

Brady counts his own Buccaneers amongst the teams who have failed to perform this season.

The 2020 season Super Bowl champions started their campaign with scratchy road wins over the Dallas Cowboys and New Orleans Saints, but have since been beaten twice at home, first by Green Bay before Kansas City romped to a 41-31 victory in Florida last weekend.

“0-2 at home sucks,” Brady said. “That’s the reality. There’s no excuses. We haven’t got the job done. “It’s a production business –- you either win or you lose.”

Brady meanwhile heads into Sunday’s game against a backdrop of tabloid gossip about the state of his marriage to Brazilian supermodel Gisele Bundchen. According to one report this week, the couple have both recently hired divorce lawyers.

Brady was not asked directly about the reports during a press conference on Thursday, but acknowledged that maintaining his singular focus on the sport in what is his 22nd season had been “challenging”.

“I think, you know, football has its challenges in different ways for everybody at different times,” Brady said. “So, it’s work. Everyone has different challenges and you deal with it the best way you can.”

– Packers’ London debut –

With so many teams struggling for form, this weekend’s fixture list will feature only one clash between two teams with winning records, when the Green Bay Packers (3-1) face the New York Giants (3-1) in London.

Packers head coach Matt LaFleur has made no secret of the fact that he is no fan of the overseas fixtures.

“I’m not going to give you my honest answer. I’d rather refrain,” LaFleur said when asked for his views on the fixture.

“It feels like a Thursday night game for us as coaches just in terms of all the preparation you’ve got to do. But you just do it, so it is what it is.”

But Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers offered a more upbeat take, insisting Green Bay were relishing the journey to Britain.

“Listen, coaches are creatures of habit, even more than players. Anytime there’s a minute adjustment to the schedule, it throws them all out of whack,” Rodgers said in reaction to LaFleur’s remarks.

Had it been up to Rodgers, Green Bay would have traveled earlier to London instead of flying into the British capital on Friday.

“We’re all excited,” Rodgers said. “I think the reason I said I wanted to go over early was just to experience a little bit of that culture, to be able to get out and see some sights and interact with fans, go to a pub and have a Guinness or whatever the local brew is.

“That’s what we all want to do, those of us that want to go over early.”

While so many teams are mired in mediocrity, the Philadelphia Eagles will look to extend their unbeaten 4-0 start to the season on the road against the Arizona Cardinals (2-2).

Eagles quarterback Jalen Hurts however is adamant the Cardinals defense has the ability to disrupt Philadelphia’s in-form offense.

“This is a really good team we’re about to play,” Hurts said. “They have a really good defense — disruptive up front.

“They have speed on the backend. So, let’s not set the precedent for that. This is a good football team.”

Elsewhere on Sunday, Josh Allen and the Buffalo Bills aim to improve to 4-1 when they host the Pittsburgh Steelers, who have struggled to a 1-3 record in the opening weeks of the season.

Bills quarterback Allen says there is no chance of the Steelers being taken lightly.

“It’s the Pittsburgh Steelers we’re talking about,” Allen said. 

“They’ve been a very good team for a very long time and it’s no secret why. The coaching staff that they’ve got in place there and continuing to develop those players.

“It’s been not fun to watch on defense knowing how many different things they can do and show you.”

IMF chief says world better prepared for this crisis

The global economy is at a difficult crossroads, buffeted by multiple shocks including soaring inflation, rising interest rates and a growing threat of broad debt crisis, but IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva told AFP that institutions are better prepared to weather this storm.

Below is an excerpt from an interview conducted ahead of the IMF and World Bank annual meetings in Washington next week:

Could the fallout in 2023 be worse than the 2008 global financial crisis?

What we had today is (a) much stronger banking sector than we had then, and that has proven to be a source of resilience for the world economy. We also have something very important: stronger central banks, truly independent with the experience that they have built since the global financial crisis. And that shows in how central banks are reacting to the signs of inflation.

Does the IMF have enough tools and financial resources?

During the last year since Covid, we have extended lending of about $270 billion. We have a lending capacity of $1 trillion. So we have space to continue to support the members. We do see an increase in requests for fund programs, not surprisingly. Just since Russia invaded Ukraine, we have provided financial support to 16 countries of about $90 billion and we are currently looking at some 21 requests… My message to countries: act early. Come to us for precautionary instruments so you can build your position in this very difficult time to sustain your economy against the risks to come.

China is a major creditor, are they doing enough to help with debt relief?

We have got… very substantive engagement with China in the context of the countries that ask for treatment under the Common Framework. And we have made good progress with China stepping up to co-chair the creditors committee for Zambia and to reach an agreement on Zambia, and now we expect the same for Chad. What we need to recognize is that the Chinese institutions are still working their way through debt issues. There are many lenders in China. Only recently the Ministry of Finance and central bank, the People’s Bank of China, got the mandate to coordinate, and it takes some time to reach that coordination. 

But time is not our friend. And this is what we have conveyed clearly, that we do not want to see individual defaults turning into opening a gateway for a debt crisis. And it is not in China’s interest. 

IMF chief says world better prepared for this crisis

The global economy is at a difficult crossroads, buffeted by multiple shocks including soaring inflation, rising interest rates and a growing threat of broad debt crisis, but IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva told AFP that institutions are better prepared to weather this storm.

Below is an excerpt from an interview conducted ahead of the IMF and World Bank annual meetings in Washington next week:

Could the fallout in 2023 be worse than the 2008 global financial crisis?

What we had today is (a) much stronger banking sector than we had then, and that has proven to be a source of resilience for the world economy. We also have something very important: stronger central banks, truly independent with the experience that they have built since the global financial crisis. And that shows in how central banks are reacting to the signs of inflation.

Does the IMF have enough tools and financial resources?

During the last year since Covid, we have extended lending of about $270 billion. We have a lending capacity of $1 trillion. So we have space to continue to support the members. We do see an increase in requests for fund programs, not surprisingly. Just since Russia invaded Ukraine, we have provided financial support to 16 countries of about $90 billion and we are currently looking at some 21 requests… My message to countries: act early. Come to us for precautionary instruments so you can build your position in this very difficult time to sustain your economy against the risks to come.

China is a major creditor, are they doing enough to help with debt relief?

We have got… very substantive engagement with China in the context of the countries that ask for treatment under the Common Framework. And we have made good progress with China stepping up to co-chair the creditors committee for Zambia and to reach an agreement on Zambia, and now we expect the same for Chad. What we need to recognize is that the Chinese institutions are still working their way through debt issues. There are many lenders in China. Only recently the Ministry of Finance and central bank, the People’s Bank of China, got the mandate to coordinate, and it takes some time to reach that coordination. 

But time is not our friend. And this is what we have conveyed clearly, that we do not want to see individual defaults turning into opening a gateway for a debt crisis. And it is not in China’s interest. 

World Bank spent almost $15 bn on fossil fuel projects since Paris deal: report

The World Bank has pumped $14.8 billion into fossil fuel projects globally in the period following the landmark Paris climate accord, a report said Thursday.

Though the multilateral lender pledged in 2018 to end financing for upstream oil and gas, the move failed to include indirect financing via intermediaries, according to the report compiled by an NGO coalition called The Big Shift Global.

It comes amid growing pressure on US President Joe Biden to fire World Bank chief David Malpass, a Trump appointee who has dodged questions about the reality of human-driven climate change.

“Each time the World Bank invests in another fossil fuel project, it fuels more climate disaster,” said Sophie Richmond of the Big Shift Campaign. “There is no justification for using taxpayers’ money to exacerbate the climate crisis.”

Under the 2015 Paris deal, world leaders committed to limiting long-term warming to 1.5 Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) to avert devastating outcomes for the planet’s future habitability. 

The biggest project listed in the report, called “Investing in Climate Disaster: World Bank Finance for Fossil Fuels,” was the Trans-Anatolian Pipeline in Azerbaijan, funded in 2018 to the tune of $1.1 billion.

“It serves to perpetuate on-going use of fossil gas in Europe,” the report said, while noting that while the pipeline may increase gas export revenues, market volatility makes it an unreliable source of income.

The World Bank Group’s own assessment stated the project was “expected to have potentially significant adverse social and environmental impacts that are diverse, irreversible, or unprecedented.”

These impacts included “landscape, water quality, air quality, noise levels, waste water, solid waste, hazardous waste, biodiversity, worker health and safety and communities health and safety during construction and operation and physical and economic resettlement.”

Despite this, the project was given the green light. 

Another project highlighted was the construction of two coal plants in Indonesia called Java 9 and 10, where the Bank supplied $65 million in indirect funds — despite the fact that the Java and Bali grid is already experiencing 40 percent oversupply of electricity.

“It is obvious that the new Java 9 & 10 coal-fired power plants will bring more disaster in terms of environmental, social and health issues, in an area already covered with coal plants and industries,” said Yuyun Indradi of Trend Asia, an NGO that promotes clean energy. 

The report’s authors also rejected the Bank’s treatment of natural gas as a “bridge” between fossil fuels and renewable energy, saying it crowded out needed investments in clean energy.

In a statement to AFP, the World Bank said, “We dispute the findings of the report: it makes inaccurate assumptions about the World Bank Group’s lending. 

“In fiscal year 2022, the Bank Group delivered a record $31.7 billion for climate-related investments, to help communities around the world respond to the climate crisis, and build a safer and cleaner future.”

World Bank spent almost $15 bn on fossil fuel projects since Paris deal: report

The World Bank has pumped $14.8 billion into fossil fuel projects globally in the period following the landmark Paris climate accord, a report said Thursday.

Though the multilateral lender pledged in 2018 to end financing for upstream oil and gas, the move failed to include indirect financing via intermediaries, according to the report compiled by an NGO coalition called The Big Shift Global.

It comes amid growing pressure on US President Joe Biden to fire World Bank chief David Malpass, a Trump appointee who has dodged questions about the reality of human-driven climate change.

“Each time the World Bank invests in another fossil fuel project, it fuels more climate disaster,” said Sophie Richmond of the Big Shift Campaign. “There is no justification for using taxpayers’ money to exacerbate the climate crisis.”

Under the 2015 Paris deal, world leaders committed to limiting long-term warming to 1.5 Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) to avert devastating outcomes for the planet’s future habitability. 

The biggest project listed in the report, called “Investing in Climate Disaster: World Bank Finance for Fossil Fuels,” was the Trans-Anatolian Pipeline in Azerbaijan, funded in 2018 to the tune of $1.1 billion.

“It serves to perpetuate on-going use of fossil gas in Europe,” the report said, while noting that while the pipeline may increase gas export revenues, market volatility makes it an unreliable source of income.

The World Bank Group’s own assessment stated the project was “expected to have potentially significant adverse social and environmental impacts that are diverse, irreversible, or unprecedented.”

These impacts included “landscape, water quality, air quality, noise levels, waste water, solid waste, hazardous waste, biodiversity, worker health and safety and communities health and safety during construction and operation and physical and economic resettlement.”

Despite this, the project was given the green light. 

Another project highlighted was the construction of two coal plants in Indonesia called Java 9 and 10, where the Bank supplied $65 million in indirect funds — despite the fact that the Java and Bali grid is already experiencing 40 percent oversupply of electricity.

“It is obvious that the new Java 9 & 10 coal-fired power plants will bring more disaster in terms of environmental, social and health issues, in an area already covered with coal plants and industries,” said Yuyun Indradi of Trend Asia, an NGO that promotes clean energy. 

The report’s authors also rejected the Bank’s treatment of natural gas as a “bridge” between fossil fuels and renewable energy, saying it crowded out needed investments in clean energy.

In a statement to AFP, the World Bank said, “We dispute the findings of the report: it makes inaccurate assumptions about the World Bank Group’s lending. 

“In fiscal year 2022, the Bank Group delivered a record $31.7 billion for climate-related investments, to help communities around the world respond to the climate crisis, and build a safer and cleaner future.”

Biden hails IBM's $20 bln investment announcement

IBM hosted US President Joe Biden Thursday to celebrate the announcement of a $20-billion investment in semiconductors, quantum computing and other cutting-edge technology in New York state.

CEO Arvind Krishna unveiled the spending, which will take place over a decade, in a speech alongside Biden in the tech giant’s Poughkeepsie facility.

“We are proud to announce that IBM is pledging to invest $20 billion across the region,” he told cheering workers.

“This investment includes breakthroughs in semiconductor technology, mainframe computers, quantum computers and artificial intelligence,” Krishna said.

Biden, who flew in to Poughkeepsie earlier for a tour of the site, hailed the pledge from the “iconic American company” as another sign that his strategy of rebuilding the US innovative edge is working.

“It’s here at this factory and the factories of other companies across America where America’s future is literally being built,” he said.

The Democrat has made a priority of encouraging growth in high-tech manufacturing, hoping to rebuild domestic supply chains in crucial components such as microchips that for years have been left to foreign companies based as far away as Taiwan.

Other major projects currently underway include Micron’s announcement of a $100-billion investment to manufacture semiconductors in New York and Wolfspeed’s pledge to spend $5 billion on a new semiconductor plant in North Carolina.

In early September, Biden visited the nascent site of Intel’s future $20-billion facility in Ohio.

“We’re better positioned globally than any time in a long time,” Biden said, hailing the US investment climate created by “the most productive workers in the world,” the “best research universities,” dynamic venture capitalists and his administration’s pushing through of the biggest federal infrastructure spending plans in decades.

Close Bitnami banner
Bitnami