World

US economy grows for first time this year in third quarter

The US economy rebounded in the third quarter, government data showed Thursday, in welcome news for President Joe Biden days before midterm elections, though analysts warn of a gloomier path ahead.

Economic issues have become a flashpoint in the United States, with decades-high inflation weighing on growth and squeezing households.

Fears of a downturn have intensified in the world’s biggest economy after two quarters of negative growth, commonly viewed as a strong signal that a recession is underway — a trend that would have global consequences and domestic political costs.

But gross domestic product rose for the first time this year, at an annual rate of 2.6 percent in the July to September period, according to Commerce Department data.

“Our economic recovery is continuing to power forward,” said Biden in a statement, later telling reporters that “things are looking good.”

But he also said that officials need to “make more progress” on bringing down costs for American households.

On Thursday, mortgage rates surged past seven percent for the first time in two decades according to the Freddie Mac survey, piling pressure on potential homebuyers.

The better-than-expected GDP performance was helped by strong trade, but housing investment plunged and weaker consumer spending on goods casts a pall on growth as higher prices bite.

Industrial supplies and materials, notably petroleum and products, kept exports robust.

In consumer spending, an increase in services was “partly offset” by a drop in products like motor vehicles and parts, along with food and beverages, data showed.

– ‘Unsustainable’ –

The leap in exports is “unsustainable,” as a strong dollar and weak global growth will pose constraints moving forward, cautioned Ian Shepherdson of Pantheon Macroeconomics.

“We’re relying on better consumption, rising government spending, and… investment to keep GDP in the black,” he added.

Overall, personal consumption expenditures — a key segment of the economy — grew 1.4 percent, slower than before.

The US economy shrank 0.6 percent in the second quarter, according to revised numbers, after a larger decline in the first three months this year.

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said Thursday that recent data signals the economy is shifting towards “sustainable growth.”

But analysts warn of risks ahead, as households grapple with soaring prices and draw down their savings.

Republicans have blamed Democrats for worsening price spikes through runaway spending, though inflation is a global issue over which presidents have limited power.

– Risks ahead –

Analysts see a slowdown in growth in the coming quarters, with the possibility of a recession in 2023.

“This will likely be the only positive quarter for the entire year,” said economist Diane Swonk of KPMG in a tweet.

While there is still some momentum in household spending and a rebound in business investment, there is also “ongoing weakness in residential investment,” added Rubeela Farooqi of High Frequency Economics.

There are particular risks to consumption “as households continue to face challenges from high prices and likely slower job growth going forward,” she said in an analysis.

Households have been reeling from decades-high inflation, with prices soaring on supply chain snarls due to Covid-19 lockdowns and fallout from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which sent food and energy costs rocketing.

To lower price pressures, the US central bank has embarked on aggressive rate hikes, walking a tightrope as it tries to avoid tipping the economy into a recession.

Already, there are signs of stress, such as a hit to the more interest-sensitive housing sector.

Rates on popular 30-year fixed-rate mortgages have also rocketed to 7.08 percent according to Freddie Mac, as the Federal Reserve’s moves ripple through the economy.

Policymakers are expected to press on with rate increases at a meeting next week, in the face of persistently high prices.

Disney unveils centenary events at London 'Mary Poppins' mansion

Disney on Thursday held a glitzy presentation of planned European events for the Hollywood studio’s 100th anniversary next year, returning to a London mansion used in its 2018 “Mary Poppins Returns” film.

Fiction’s most famous English nanny with magical powers was on hand to greet arriving celebrity attendees, urging them to “run along” through the venue’s columned hall filled with projections of Disney cartoons.

Events previewed at the show include a “Disney100” exhibition of historic film costumes and props that will be shown at ExCel in London next autumn. 

The studio will also stage a multimedia concert tour, with the Hollywood Sound Orchestra performing movie soundtracks as audiences watch scenes from films, which will have eight UK dates starting in May.

Events will also take place in Germany, Switzerland, Austria and France through next year.

Brothers Walt and Roy Disney founded the company in 1923 and it has evolved over the ensuing century from making lavish cartoon films such as “Bambi” to entering today’s video streaming market.

It is now increasingly behind dramas and documentaries, as well as movie franchises, while subsidiary operations include theme parks and TV networks.

“Over the past 100 years I think we’ve seen how it’s changed, starting off with one of the first cartoons set to sound (a 1928 Mickey Mouse film called “Steamboat Willie),” said Nicole Morse, a company vice president responsible for brand strategy.

The venue for Thursday’s showcase, Banking Hall in the City of London, was chosen because it featured in film “Mary Poppins Returns” released four years ago, she noted.

Silver models of Minnie and Mickey Mouse, artists drawing the famous characters for guests, alongside costumed Snoopy and Chip and Dale mascots, completed the Hollywood-evoking scene in the financial district building. 

Last month Disney held a preview of anniversary events for US fans at its D23 Expo in Anaheim, California.

The centenary comes as Disney+, its streaming service, is set to follow competitor Netflix in launching cheaper ad-subsidised subscriptions in December.

US sees 'acute threat' from Russia, but says China is main challenge

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine highlights the “acute threat” posed by Moscow, but China is the most consequential challenge for the United States, the Pentagon said Thursday.

The dangers are both conventional — Moscow’s aggression toward its neighbors and Beijing’s efforts to gain control of Taiwan — and nuclear, with Russia possessing an extensive arsenal and China’s stocks of atomic weapons growing fast.

US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin highlighted the different challenges posed by China and Russia as he unveiled the unclassified versions of several military strategy documents.

China “is the only competitor out there with both the intent to reshape the international order, and increasingly the power to do so,” Austin said.

“Unlike China, Russia can’t systemically challenge the United States over the long term. But Russian aggression does pose an immediate and sharp threat.”

The National Defense Strategy, which was released Thursday, likewise places the primary emphasis on China.

Beijing is seeking to “refashion the Indo-Pacific region and the international system to suit its interests and authoritarian preferences,” it says, describing this dynamic as “the most comprehensive and serious challenge to US national security.”

The strategy says Chinese rhetoric about and “coercive activity” toward self-ruled Taiwan — which Beijing has vowed to take control of, by force if necessary — is a destabilizing factor that risks miscalculation and threatens peace in the area.

As for Russia, it says the “acute threat” posed by Moscow has been most recently demonstrated by Moscow’s February invasion of Ukraine.

– ‘Emerging threat’ of climate change –

“The Department (of Defense) will support robust deterrence of Russian aggression against vital US national interests, including our treaty Allies,” the strategy says.

In a departure from the previous National Defense Strategy, which was issued during Donald Trump’s presidency, the newly released document classifies climate change as an “emerging threat.”

The US “will integrate climate change into threat assessments,” as well as increasing the “resiliency of military installations” and taking “climate extremes” into account in decisions on training and equipping the armed forces, the strategy says.

In an updated report on US nuclear posture released in parallel with the National Defense Strategy, the Pentagon defines the role of its nuclear arsenal as deterring both nuclear and non-nuclear attacks that have strategic consequences.

“This includes nuclear employment of any scale, and it includes high-consequence attacks of a strategic nature that use non-nuclear means,” a senior defense official told journalists.

The Nuclear Posture Review emphasizes that China’s nuclear arsenal is growing, but says Russia’s is currently more extensive.

– Warning to North Korea –

“By the 2030s the United States will, for the first time in its history, face two major nuclear powers as strategic competitors and potential adversaries,” the document says.

It emphasizes the importance of modernizing US strategic assets, while scrapping a submarine-launched nuclear cruise missile program and saying a type of obsolete nuclear bomb will be retired.

The document also contains a stark warning for Kim Jong Un against employing North Korea’s growing nuclear arsenal.

“Any nuclear attack by North Korea against the United States or its allies and partners is unacceptable and will result in the end of that regime. There is no scenario in which the Kim regime could employ nuclear weapons and survive,” it says.

The Missile Defense Review — also released Thursday — likewise points to growing threats from China and Russia.

Beijing is closing the gap with Washington when it comes to ballistic and hypersonic missile technology, while Moscow is modernizing its intercontinental-range missile systems and developing advanced precision-strike missiles.

The document says drones — which Russia has used to strike against Ukrainian cities and energy infrastructure — are also a threat that is likely to grow.

Russian President Vladimir Putin meanwhile offered a distinctly different take on the international strategic environment Thursday, saying Moscow is trying to “defend its right to exist” in the face of Western efforts to “destroy” his country.

“Ahead is probably the most dangerous, unpredictable and at the same time important decade since the end of the Second World War,” he said.

Strong McDonald's results showcase advantage amid inflation

McDonald’s reported stronger-than-expected quarterly profits Thursday as executives pointed to signs it is drawing customers priced out of more expensive restaurants.

The fast-food chain, known for the Big Mac and its golden arches logo, scored a 9.5 percent jump in global comparable store sales as it benefitted from higher guest counts and “strategic” price increases.

While McDonald’s has not seen significant trade down among its own consumers, the company is “benefitting from trade down” from more expensive restaurant categories, Chief Executive Chris Kempczinski said on a conference call with analysts.

Executives said the dynamics favor the brand.

“We actually think we’ve got pricing power right now,” a McDonald’s executive said on the conference call. “We’re gaining share among low-income consumers and that goes back to the fact that we are positioned as the leading brand in terms of value for money and affordability.”

Profits declined eight percent to $2 billion from the year-ago period, while revenues fell five percent to $5.9 billion, reflecting the chain’s smaller footprint after the sale of McDonald’s Russia business earlier this year.

McDonald’s said it continued to face heavy cost pressures across its operations for food, paper and energy. 

The company’s base economic scenario calls for a “mild to moderate” recession in the United States and one that is “potentially a little deeper and longer in Europe.”

“We’re going to continue to have inflation into 2023, both food and paper as well as labor, but we like our position relative to competitor in terms of where we stand,” Kempczinski said on a conference call.

In the United States, McDonald’s raised prices 10 percent compared with the year-ago period, executives said on the call.

In Europe, the company plans to set up a program to provide financial support to franchise companies struggling with economic conditions, especially spiking energy prices.

The program will be akin to efforts set up early in Covid-19, when McDonald’s established $1 billion in liquidity assistance to help franchisee companies facing financial stress.

Shares jumped 3.6 percent to $265.73 in afternoon trading.

US economy grows for first time this year in third quarter

The US economy rebounded in the third quarter, government data showed Thursday, in welcome news for President Joe Biden days before midterm elections, though analysts warn of a gloomier path ahead.

Economic issues have become a flashpoint in the United States, with decades-high inflation weighing on growth and squeezing households.

Fears of a downturn have intensified in the world’s biggest economy after two quarters of negative growth, commonly viewed as a strong signal that a recession is underway — a trend that would have global consequences and domestic political costs.

But gross domestic product rose for the first time this year, at an annual rate of 2.6 percent in the July to September period, according to the latest Commerce Department data.

“Our economic recovery is continuing to power forward,” said Biden in a statement, later telling reporters that “things are looking good”.

But he also said that officials need to “make more progress” on bringing down high costs for American households.

On Thursday, mortgage rates surged past seven percent for the first time in two decades according to the Freddie Mac survey, piling further pressure on potential homebuyers.

The better-than-expected GDP performance was helped by strong trade, but housing investment plunged and weaker consumer spending on goods casts a pall on growth as higher prices bite.

Industrial supplies and materials, notably petroleum and products, kept exports robust.

In consumer spending, an increase in services was “partly offset” by a drop in products like motor vehicles and parts, along with food and beverages, data showed.

– ‘Unsustainable’ –

The leap in exports is “unsustainable,” as a strong dollar and weak global growth will pose constraints moving forward, cautioned Ian Shepherdson of Pantheon Macroeconomics.

A fall in imports that helped net trade also marks a reversal of earlier inventory rebuilding, but that is now over, he said.

“We’re relying on better consumption, rising government spending, and… investment to keep GDP in the black,” he added.

Overall, personal consumption expenditures — a key segment of the economy — grew 1.4 percent, slower than before.

The US economy shrank 0.6 percent in the second quarter, according to revised numbers, after a larger decline in the first three months this year.

Biden has insisted that the economy is on the right path, but analysts warn of risks ahead, as households grapple with soaring prices and draw down on their savings.

– Risks ahead –

Republicans have blamed Democrats for worsening price spikes through runaway spending, though inflation is a global issue that presidents have limited power over.

Analysts see a slowdown in growth in the coming quarters, with the possibility of a recession in 2023.

“This will likely be the only positive quarter for the entire year,” said economist Diane Swonk of KPMG in a tweet.

While there is still some momentum in household spending and a rebound in business investment, there is also “ongoing weakness in residential investment,” added Rubeela Farooqi of High Frequency Economics.

There are particular risks to consumption “as households continue to face challenges from high prices and likely slower job growth going forward,” she said in an analysis.

Households have been reeling from decades-high inflation, with prices soaring on supply chain snarls due to Covid-19 lockdowns and fallout from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which sent food and energy costs rocketing.

To lower price pressures, the US central bank has embarked on aggressive rate hikes, walking a tightrope as it tries to avoid tipping the economy into a recession.

Already, there are signs of stress, such as a hit to the more interest-sensitive housing sector.

Rates on popular 30-year fixed-rate mortgages have also rocketed to 7.08 percent according to Freddie Mac, as the Federal Reserve’s moves ripple through the economy.

Policymakers are expected to press on with rate increases at a meeting next week, in the face of persistently high prices.

Credit Suisse launches radical overhaul to stabilise bank

Credit Suisse unveiled radical measures Thursday aimed at turning around the beleaguered bank following huge third quarter losses, including revamping its investment banking, slashing 9,000 jobs and a capital injection from the Saudi National Bank.

Switzerland’s second-biggest bank launched a new strategy intended to repair the damage following a series of scandals, saying it wanted to create “a simpler, more focused and more stable bank”.

“We all know Credit Suisse is at a critical point in its history,” chairman Axel Lehmann said.

For months, if not years, it has been “overshadowed by various issues”, while he acknowleged that the 166-year-old institution had become unfocused.

“We need to draw a line,” he insisted.

Lehmann said the reassessment of the bank’s direction included “a radical strategy and a plan to create a stronger, more resilient and more efficient bank with a firm foundation”.

The revamp came as Credit Suisse unveiled a third quarter net loss of 4.034 billion Swiss francs ($4.07 billion).

The Zurich-based bank revealed it was going for a “radical restructuring” of its investment bank, an accelerated cost-cutting effort, and strengthened and reallocated capital, “all of which are designed to create a new Credit Suisse”.

The group’s shares slid on the announcements, closing down 18.6 percent on the Swiss stock exchange’s main SMI index at 3.877 Swiss francs.

“The reaction is negative, which is not good. I think the markets were expecting more drastic things,” Carlo Lombardini, a professor of banking law at the University of Lausanne, told AFP.

“The bank is not going to go bankrupt… but the question is how it will generate income in a difficult market”.

– Saudi investment –

The bank intends to raise capital worth four billion Swiss francs ($4 billion) through issuing new shares to qualified investors, including Saudi National Bank, which has committed to invest up to 1.5 billion Swiss francs.

The Saudi bank will thus take a stake of up to 9.9 percent, becoming a chief shareholder alongside the US company Harris Associates (10.05 percent) and the sovereign wealth fund of Qatar (5.03 percent).

Making a capital increase is a “fairly radical choice”, said David Benamou, director of investments at Axiom Alternative Investments.

He told AFP it was a “very good message” for customers and creditors.

The Ethos foundation, which represents pension funds in Switzerland, welcomed that bank “finally seems to have understood that it was necessary to stop the investment banking”.

However, it criticised the Saudi injection, telling AFP that the current shareholders “have suffered a very significant dilution effect”.

– ‘Lengthy process’ –

Credit Suisse said it expects staff numbers to drop by 9,000 to approximately 43,000 staff by the end of 2025.

The group will also reduce its cost base by 15 percent, or around 2.5 billion Swiss francs, delivering a cost base of around 14.5 billion Swiss francs in 2025.

Credit Suisse will refocus on its most stable activities — wealth management and Swiss banking — and reduce its merchant banking.

It will revive its First Boston brand, named after an US investment bank it absorbed in 1990, where its capital market and advisory activities will be brought together.

Andreas Venditti, an analyst at Swiss investment managers Vontobel, said Koerner’s new strategic plan was “just the first step in a lengthy process to restore credibility and regain the trust” of Credit Suisse’s stakeholders.

“Resolute execution and no further mis-steps will be key and it will take time until results will begin to show,” he said.

Analysts at the US investment bank Jefferies said the capital raise was “larger than we thought it would be, and third quarter results show another quarter-on-quarter deterioration in momentum that we find concerning, though not very surprising”.

– Archegos, Greensill shocks –

Credit Suisse’s capital-guzzling investment banking arm has been the source of heavy losses which plunged Credit Suisse’s accounts into the red — eclipsing its more stable activities such as wealth management or its Swiss domestic banking services.

Credit Suisse’s investment bank suffered a loss of 3.7 billion Swiss francs in 2021 and backed that up with a 992 million Swiss franc loss in the first half of 2022.

It was hit by the implosion of US fund Archegos, which cost Credit Suisse more than $5 billion.

Meanwhile its asset management branch was rocked by the bankruptcy of British financial firm Greensill, in which some $10 billion had been committed through four funds.

Credit Suisse is one of 30 banks globally deemed too big to fail, forcing it to set aside more cash to weather a crisis.

While many industry experts think a bankruptcy highly improbable, these rumours helped drag its share price down to a low of 3.158 Swiss francs on October 3.

Credit Suisse launches radical overhaul to stabilise bank

Credit Suisse unveiled radical measures Thursday aimed at turning around the beleaguered bank following huge third quarter losses, including revamping its investment banking, slashing 9,000 jobs and a capital injection from the Saudi National Bank.

Switzerland’s second-biggest bank launched a new strategy intended to repair the damage following a series of scandals, saying it wanted to create “a simpler, more focused and more stable bank”.

“We all know Credit Suisse is at a critical point in its history,” chairman Axel Lehmann said.

For months, if not years, it has been “overshadowed by various issues”, while he acknowleged that the 166-year-old institution had become unfocused.

“We need to draw a line,” he insisted.

Lehmann said the reassessment of the bank’s direction included “a radical strategy and a plan to create a stronger, more resilient and more efficient bank with a firm foundation”.

The revamp came as Credit Suisse unveiled a third quarter net loss of 4.034 billion Swiss francs ($4.07 billion).

The Zurich-based bank revealed it was going for a “radical restructuring” of its investment bank, an accelerated cost-cutting effort, and strengthened and reallocated capital, “all of which are designed to create a new Credit Suisse”.

The group’s shares slid on the announcements, closing down 18.6 percent on the Swiss stock exchange’s main SMI index at 3.877 Swiss francs.

“The reaction is negative, which is not good. I think the markets were expecting more drastic things,” Carlo Lombardini, a professor of banking law at the University of Lausanne, told AFP.

“The bank is not going to go bankrupt… but the question is how it will generate income in a difficult market”.

– Saudi investment –

The bank intends to raise capital worth four billion Swiss francs ($4 billion) through issuing new shares to qualified investors, including Saudi National Bank, which has committed to invest up to 1.5 billion Swiss francs.

The Saudi bank will thus take a stake of up to 9.9 percent, becoming a chief shareholder alongside the US company Harris Associates (10.05 percent) and the sovereign wealth fund of Qatar (5.03 percent).

Making a capital increase is a “fairly radical choice”, said David Benamou, director of investments at Axiom Alternative Investments.

He told AFP it was a “very good message” for customers and creditors.

The Ethos foundation, which represents pension funds in Switzerland, welcomed that bank “finally seems to have understood that it was necessary to stop the investment banking”.

However, it criticised the Saudi injection, telling AFP that the current shareholders “have suffered a very significant dilution effect”.

– ‘Lengthy process’ –

Credit Suisse said it expects staff numbers to drop by 9,000 to approximately 43,000 staff by the end of 2025.

The group will also reduce its cost base by 15 percent, or around 2.5 billion Swiss francs, delivering a cost base of around 14.5 billion Swiss francs in 2025.

Credit Suisse will refocus on its most stable activities — wealth management and Swiss banking — and reduce its merchant banking.

It will revive its First Boston brand, named after an US investment bank it absorbed in 1990, where its capital market and advisory activities will be brought together.

Andreas Venditti, an analyst at Swiss investment managers Vontobel, said Koerner’s new strategic plan was “just the first step in a lengthy process to restore credibility and regain the trust” of Credit Suisse’s stakeholders.

“Resolute execution and no further mis-steps will be key and it will take time until results will begin to show,” he said.

Analysts at the US investment bank Jefferies said the capital raise was “larger than we thought it would be, and third quarter results show another quarter-on-quarter deterioration in momentum that we find concerning, though not very surprising”.

– Archegos, Greensill shocks –

Credit Suisse’s capital-guzzling investment banking arm has been the source of heavy losses which plunged Credit Suisse’s accounts into the red — eclipsing its more stable activities such as wealth management or its Swiss domestic banking services.

Credit Suisse’s investment bank suffered a loss of 3.7 billion Swiss francs in 2021 and backed that up with a 992 million Swiss franc loss in the first half of 2022.

It was hit by the implosion of US fund Archegos, which cost Credit Suisse more than $5 billion.

Meanwhile its asset management branch was rocked by the bankruptcy of British financial firm Greensill, in which some $10 billion had been committed through four funds.

Credit Suisse is one of 30 banks globally deemed too big to fail, forcing it to set aside more cash to weather a crisis.

While many industry experts think a bankruptcy highly improbable, these rumours helped drag its share price down to a low of 3.158 Swiss francs on October 3.

War in Ukraine strains ties between Africa and West

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has dug a rift between African countries and supporters in the West who are urging the continent to show solidarity with Europe.

The problems were on uncomfortable display this week at the Dakar International Forum on Peace and Security, where the conflict was a major theme.

Russia’s invasion is “an existential threat to the stability and integrity of our continent”, French minister of state Chrysoula Zacharopoulou told the conference.

“That’s why we expect solidarity from Africa,” she said.

She pinned the blame on the Kremlin for soaring energy and food costs that have buffeted the world economy but hit African countries most of all.

“Russia is solely responsible for this economic, energy and food crisis,” she said.

Senegal’s President Macky Sall, who is also current head of the African Union, said Africa was “not against Ukraine,” and Africans were not “insensitive to the situation” there.

But, like others at the conference, he said that many Africans felt that their own problems, such as security, the economy or health, were being ignored.

“Africans say that even while Ukraine is at war, is being invaded, is being attacked, Africa is under permanent attack from terrorism,” Sall said.

“This is 2022, this is no longer the colonial period… so countries, even if they are poor, have equal dignity. Their problems have to be handled with respect.”

– ‘Western patronising’ –

Former Nigerien president, Mahamadou Issoufou, said it was disheartening to see so much support for the Ukrainian army, when the Sahel region from which he hails was scrambling to find funds to battle jihadists.

“It’s shocking for Africans to see the billions that have rained down on Ukraine while attention has been diverted from the situation in the Sahel,” he said.

In contrast, he added, the G5 anti-jihadist force originally supposed to bring together troops from Burkina Faso, Mauritania, Niger, Chad and Mali had found it much harder to drum up $400 million.

Malian Foreign Minister Abdoulaye Diop, who said his junta-ruled country this year left the G5 over it coming under too much “French pressure”, also saw a disparity.

“For Ukraine, where they have asked Africa to take a stand, in just a few days they raised more than eight billion (dollars),” he said.

“It’s a policy of double standards. All human lives — black, white, red and yellow — are equal.”

Conference host Senegal, which has close ties with Western countries, caused a stir on March 2 by abstaining, like many other African states, from a UN General Assembly vote on a resolution demanding Russia stop using force against Ukraine.

Foreign Minister Aissata Tall Sall this week told TV5 Monde the move had reflected the need to “seek a common African position” at a time when her country had just taken over the chair of the AU.

Nearly half of African countries either abstained or did not vote in a UN resolution on October 13 on whether to condemning Russian annexation of more Ukrainian territory.

Aude Darnal, a non-resident fellow at the Stimson Center, a US think tank on international security, said Africa had been seeking new partners in recent years.

“African states have sought to diversify their partnerships with other smaller and emerging powers, like India and Turkey” — both at the forum — “and great powers like China and Russia, all posing as equal partners,” she said. 

“There has also been growing fatigue towards a sense of Western patronising,” she added.

African states were seeking “to protect and advance their interests and partnerships with all sides”.

– ‘Self-centred’? –

But Niagale Bagayoko, the president of the African Security Sector Network (ASSN), dismissed the argument that the world had abandoned Africa as “very difficult to accept”.

“Africa is at the heart of the international agenda,” she said. 

“If we really look at the budget for peacekeeping operations, external interventions, then apart from the Middle East, Africa over the past 10 years is the region that has received the most interventions, including sporadic interventions from the Americans.”

She said she feared that recent reactions of African politicians “give the impression that Africans’ only concern with a conflict that is having consequences on the whole world is its repercussions on their own security.”

“It reminds me of Europeans who believe that the only point in being concerned by the conflict in the Sahel, for example, is to protect the (European) continent from migration.”

The risk, she said, is that Western countries too could respond “in the same self-centred manner” when the next international call comes for investment to help Africa.

Seeking 'healthy' debate, Musk nears Twitter deal finish line

Closing in on his Twitter megadeal, Elon Musk said Thursday his goal is to enable “healthy” debate of ideas and counter the tendency of social media to splinter into partisan “echo chambers.”

In a message meant to reassure jittery Twitter advertisers on the eve of a court-imposed deadline to finalize the deal, Musk said he would work with marketers to “build something extraordinary together.”

The billionaire entrepreneur pursued the $44 billion deal “because it is important to the future of civilization to have a common digital town square, where a wide range of beliefs can be debated in a healthy manner,” Musk tweeted.

The planned takeover has dismayed activists who fear a surge in harassment and misinformation under the unpredictable Musk, who himself is known for trolling other Twitter users.

But Musk said he realizes Twitter “cannot become a free-for-all hellscape where anything can be said with no consequences.”

The Tesla boss’s on-again, off-again acquisition of the platform appeared to be entering its final phase after a Delaware judge paused litigation on October 6 on Twitter’s suit against Musk after he previously walked away from the deal.

Musk has reportedly been lining up financing and, while there is always the chance of a last-minute curveball, more signs point to the deal’s likely closure.

The New York Stock Exchange posted a pending order to suspend trading in Twitter before Friday’s session.

Shares of Twitter climbed 1.1 percent to $53.96 near 1615 GMT Thursday, not far below the $54.20 purchase price in Musk’s deal.

“We expect Musk and Twitter to officially close the deal by Friday morning with Cinderella finally getting the glass slipper that fits,” said Wedbush analyst Dan Ives.

– ‘Chief Twit’ –

Musk originally agreed to the Twitter acquisition in April, but soon pulled back, saying in July he was canceling the contract because he was misled by Twitter over the number of fake “bot” accounts — allegations rejected by the company.

Twitter in turn sought to prove Musk, who also heads aerospace firm SpaceX, was contriving excuses to walk away simply because he changed his mind.

A trial on Twitter’s suit was scheduled for mid-October, but the Delaware court gave the parties until 5:00 pm on October 28, 2022 to close the transaction.

Fresh questions about the deal and Twitter’s future surfaced last week following reports Musk planned deep staff cuts.

But on Wednesday, Musk changed his Twitter profile to “Chief Twit” and posted a video of himself walking into the company’s California headquarters carrying a sink.

The South African-born entrepreneur cuts a polarizing figure in American business.

Supporters cheer his disruptive spirit and achievements at Tesla, while detractors criticize him as a megalomaniac with a dangerous tendency to wade into geopolitical topics in which he lacks expertise, such as the Russia-Ukraine conflict. 

In his latest statement Thursday, Musk said much of the public speculation about his intentions in the deal had been “wrong” as he insisted his goals were noble.

In pursuing Twitter, “I didn’t do it because it would be easy. I didn’t do it to make more money,” Musk said. 

“I did so with humility, recognizing that failure in pursuing this goal, despite our best efforts, is a very real possibility.”

Musk urged marketers to devise ads that are “as relevant as possible” to consumers, appealing to the industry at a time when tech giants Google and Facebook have reported big declines in advertising revenue.

“Low relevancy ads are spam, but highly relevant ads are actually content!” he said.

Insider Intelligence analyst Jasmine Enberg said Twitter’s ad business has suffered due to uncertainty surrounding the Musk deal, as well as the macroeconomic concerns that have buffeted the broader online ad industry.

“Even slightly loosening content moderation on the platform is sure to spook advertisers, many of whom already find Twitter’s brand safety tools to be lacking compared with other social platforms,” Enberg said.

Having more relevant ads is “a noble goal, but one that is difficult to accomplish,” Enberg said.

“Musk is set to acquire Twitter at a time when data is already scarce and users are highly skeptical of forking over more personal information to social platforms.”

Seeking 'healthy' debate, Musk nears Twitter deal finish line

Closing in on his Twitter megadeal, Elon Musk said Thursday his goal is to enable “healthy” debate of ideas and counter the tendency of social media to splinter into partisan “echo chambers.”

In a message meant to reassure jittery Twitter advertisers on the eve of a court-imposed deadline to finalize the deal, Musk said he would work with marketers to “build something extraordinary together.”

The billionaire entrepreneur pursued the $44 billion deal “because it is important to the future of civilization to have a common digital town square, where a wide range of beliefs can be debated in a healthy manner,” Musk tweeted.

The planned takeover has dismayed activists who fear a surge in harassment and misinformation under the unpredictable Musk, who himself is known for trolling other Twitter users.

But Musk said he realizes Twitter “cannot become a free-for-all hellscape where anything can be said with no consequences.”

The Tesla boss’s on-again, off-again acquisition of the platform appeared to be entering its final phase after a Delaware judge paused litigation on October 6 on Twitter’s suit against Musk after he previously walked away from the deal.

Musk has reportedly been lining up financing and, while there is always the chance of a last-minute curveball, more signs point to the deal’s likely closure.

The New York Stock Exchange posted a pending order to suspend trading in Twitter before Friday’s session.

Shares of Twitter climbed 1.1 percent to $53.96 near 1615 GMT Thursday, not far below the $54.20 purchase price in Musk’s deal.

“We expect Musk and Twitter to officially close the deal by Friday morning with Cinderella finally getting the glass slipper that fits,” said Wedbush analyst Dan Ives.

– ‘Chief Twit’ –

Musk originally agreed to the Twitter acquisition in April, but soon pulled back, saying in July he was canceling the contract because he was misled by Twitter over the number of fake “bot” accounts — allegations rejected by the company.

Twitter in turn sought to prove Musk, who also heads aerospace firm SpaceX, was contriving excuses to walk away simply because he changed his mind.

A trial on Twitter’s suit was scheduled for mid-October, but the Delaware court gave the parties until 5:00 pm on October 28, 2022 to close the transaction.

Fresh questions about the deal and Twitter’s future surfaced last week following reports Musk planned deep staff cuts.

But on Wednesday, Musk changed his Twitter profile to “Chief Twit” and posted a video of himself walking into the company’s California headquarters carrying a sink.

The South African-born entrepreneur cuts a polarizing figure in American business.

Supporters cheer his disruptive spirit and achievements at Tesla, while detractors criticize him as a megalomaniac with a dangerous tendency to wade into geopolitical topics in which he lacks expertise, such as the Russia-Ukraine conflict. 

In his latest statement Thursday, Musk said much of the public speculation about his intentions in the deal had been “wrong” as he insisted his goals were noble.

In pursuing Twitter, “I didn’t do it because it would be easy. I didn’t do it to make more money,” Musk said. 

“I did so with humility, recognizing that failure in pursuing this goal, despite our best efforts, is a very real possibility.”

Musk urged marketers to devise ads that are “as relevant as possible” to consumers, appealing to the industry at a time when tech giants Google and Facebook have reported big declines in advertising revenue.

“Low relevancy ads are spam, but highly relevant ads are actually content!” he said.

Insider Intelligence analyst Jasmine Enberg said Twitter’s ad business has suffered due to uncertainty surrounding the Musk deal, as well as the macroeconomic concerns that have buffeted the broader online ad industry.

“Even slightly loosening content moderation on the platform is sure to spook advertisers, many of whom already find Twitter’s brand safety tools to be lacking compared with other social platforms,” Enberg said.

Having more relevant ads is “a noble goal, but one that is difficult to accomplish,” Enberg said.

“Musk is set to acquire Twitter at a time when data is already scarce and users are highly skeptical of forking over more personal information to social platforms.”

Close Bitnami banner
Bitnami