Bloomberg

Singapore’s $744 Billion Fund Eyes Deals in Low-Return World

(Bloomberg) — As the world’s most acquisitive sovereign wealth fund turns 40, it’s never had so much money to manage — nor faced more challenges trying to manage it.

Two investment pillars that have helped fuel growth for Singapore’s GIC Pte. — China and bonds — are under siege from inflation, geopolitics and regulatory crackdowns. The national budget meanwhile requires ever more revenue, putting pressure on GIC to deliver robust returns, prompting one of the biggest asset pivots in its history.

“Our expectation going forward is that the challenges are big and varied and there aren’t a lot of historical precedents,” said Chief Executive Officer Lim Chow Kiat, a GIC veteran of 28 years, in a rare interview. “The last time we had a serious inflation problem I was just born.”

GIC was founded in 1981 to help manage the excess reserves for a fledgling 16-year-old country. Launched with a handful of local staff, borrowed office equipment and three fund managers from U.S. firms, it has since grown into a quiet giant in global finance. 

Even by the secretive standards of sovereign wealth funds, GIC stands apart for its riches and discretion. It doesn’t release annual returns and won’t say how much it manages, though estimates from data providers put it as high as $744 billion. New rules passed in Parliament could raise that to almost $900 billion, making it the third-largest fund of its kind after Norway and China.

With that size comes enhanced challenges of maintaining returns and finding new assets to back, while funding Singapore’s government. Since 2018, investment gains from GIC, the central bank and state investor Temasek Holdings Pte. have been the single biggest contributor to the national budget. While some peers are used as rainy day funds, GIC is integral to the city-state as an aging population, rising health-care costs and low tax rates threaten to strain finances.

GIC has posted a 6.8% nominal gain each year over the past two decades, on par with several of its peers, according to Global SWF, a research firm. Long-term returns were boosted by a massive 38% jump in the fiscal year that ended last March, Global SWF said.

“The important thing for GIC is to maintain steady investment returns,” said Lim Siong Guan, the former group president who helped shape its current strategy.

China has been a key part of GIC’s growth. It made an early decision to invest there when much of the world was holding back, starting in the 1980s when former prime minister and inaugural GIC Chair Lee Kuan Yew predicted China would thrive as its economy opened up.

“It was he who sort of alerted us and said ‘the rise of China is irreversible,’” said Ng Kok Song, who stepped down as chief investment officer in 2013.

Pushing into China’s undeveloped markets was a tough ask. GIC scoured the country, backing everything from Shanghai office blocks and agricultural banks to toilet and washing-machine makers. The investments turned what started as a Western-centric fund into a diversified portfolio, with Asia now representing 34% of holdings, matching the U.S. 

Bets on technology giants like Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and Xiaomi Corp. before they went public generated huge windfalls, though gains from China are now under threat on several fronts amid a prolonged stand-off with the U.S.

“Certainly it’s a concern – if bifurcation is to happen, that will affect global investors because it makes it much harder for you to have that freedom to just pick and choose,” said Lim, 51, from GIC’s 37th-floor office in the business district.

Risks are also rising within China. GIC was a major investor in Luckin Coffee Inc., before selling down its stake ahead of an accounting scandal that gutted its share price. Last year, Singapore acknowledged that GIC and Temasek suffered losses after Beijing cracked down on the online education space. GIC was also an early investor in Ant Group Co., the fintech giant that was forced to scrap its $35 billion listing amid a crackdown on that sector.

China Bull

Lim, an avid jogger who’s been head of GIC for five years, remains bullish on China. He sees it as a source of growth and a counter-cyclical hedge to other markets. GIC will likely buy more sovereign bonds, and hasn’t been scared off by the recent defaults at China Evergrande Group and other property developers.

“We believe they have enough central bank balance sheet, and within their system they have enough levers to make sure that things do not spiral out of control,” Lim said. “They have the will to continue with reforms and opening up and that will provide future growth.”

Beyond China, inflation could have a big impact on GIC’s returns. Nominal bonds and cash made up 39% of its portfolio as of March, with inflation-linked notes representing another 6%. Lim said future returns “are likely to be lower,” casting doubt on the 60/40 stock-bond portfolio that’s been a pension fund mainstay for years.

“If we feel that inflation is going to be a real sticky problem, then of course you have to start shifting your portfolio toward more inflation-protected assets,” said Lim, describing nominal bonds as the most vulnerable. “Within stocks, if you can find companies which have pricing power that will help,” along with commodities.

Another potential growth driver for GIC is the environmental, social and governance space. An internal ESG investment pool created in 2020 now has “billions of dollars” at its disposal, according to Liew Tzu Mi, head of fixed income and sustainability. In recent years, it’s struck deals in areas like blue hydrogen and solar farm builders.

GIC backs polluters as long as they have a plan to become more sustainable. In recent years, it bought into natural gas pipelines, while holding a major stake in China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. Unlike Temasek, GIC hasn’t set a 2050 net zero goal, arguing it would affect its ability to invest in countries like China and India that have later targets.

To help juice returns, the fund is also turning to private equity, almost doubling its allocation to 15% since 2013. Global SWF estimates GIC deployed $34.5 billion in 110 deals last year — its busiest ever — led by logistics and other real estate. That made it the top spending state-owned investor for the fourth-straight year, ahead of second-place Canada Pension Plan Investment Board. The Global SWF data combines sovereign wealth and public pension funds in their rankings.

“I would expect every year to continue to build on what we’ve been able to do,” said Eric Wilmes, who heads private equity for the Americas. “This isn’t a one-year trend or 18-month trend.”

Losing Flexibility

GIC’s surging assets are both a strength and a problem. It means the fund has to strike bigger deals to maintain growth, and those can be hard to find. Many of its investment partners are also expanding, potentially shrinking its allocations on transactions.

“GIC may be growing too much and by growing too much, it may be losing flexibility as an organization,” said Diego Lopez, managing director of Global SWF. “Is it better to split the investment units into pockets?”

The shift to private equity highlights one of GIC’s conundrums – a sovereign fund in a country of just 5.5 million people must attract global talent to scout out deals. Of the more than 1,800 staff as of March, almost half were foreigners, up from about a third in 2016.

Unlike many banks and private equity firms, GIC is known for its modesty and public-service ethos. Showing up to the office in a sports car attracts unwanted attention from colleagues, several current and former employees said, asking not to be identified. Lim’s predecessor was known to take the subway to work. In the official history of the fund, the minister who founded GIC is lionized for being so frugal he washed his own underwear on business trips.

Bonus Pay

GIC’s salaries and bonuses are generally commensurate with private peers, though the system for carry –- a kind of profit sharing with private equity investors -– tends to be more complex to calculate, people with knowledge of the matter said.

“It’s easier to attract Singaporeans — you can infuse them with a sense of meaning,” said Ng. “The test of it is, are you able to attract non-Singaporeans?”

For Lim Siong Guan, who now teaches leadership and change management at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, what’s needed is a fundamental shift in the mindset of more locals.

“We say we’re short of entrepreneurs, we’re short of research scientists and generally we’re short of leaders,” he said. “Our real shortage is of people who are prepared to go in, try and sometimes win or lose – people who are comfortable not being like the rest.”

GIC also faces a challenge in global brand awareness. While anyone who has worked in finance would know the fund, it’s not a household name in other circles, making it harder to crack deals in rising areas like biotechnology or agriculture.

To counter that, GIC leverages its reputation as a reliable institutional partner, investing increasingly earlier in funding rounds and staying beyond the IPO without making big demands or joining activist moves along the way. 

“GIC is a long-term investor,” Lim said. “That from day one has been something we emphasize – we keep to that part.”

Birthday Gala

Support for GIC was on display last November as some of the world’s leading financiers filed past lines of heavily armed guards into the Shangri-La Hotel to celebrate the fund’s 40th birthday. Between the courses and a performance by Singapore’s Purple Symphony, executives from Silver Lake Management LLC, PAG and Bank of New York Mellon Corp. heaped praise on GIC as Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong looked on.

“Everybody who’s anybody knows who GIC is and they always get first call on interesting ideas,” said Pacific Investment Management Co. Vice Chairman John Studzinski. “They really are regarded as role models among sovereign funds.”

(Updates with comment from Lim Siong Guan in 29th paragraph. An earlier version corrected the title of Eric Wilmes and a hotel name.)

More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com

©2022 Bloomberg L.P.

Nintendo Heirs Buy Majority Stake in Activist Fund Taiyo Pacific, Nikkei Says

(Bloomberg) — The investment firm managing the wealth of Nintendo Co.’s founders purchased a majority stake in Taiyo Pacific Partners, a U.S. activist fund focused on Japanese equities, according to Nikkei.

The Yamauchi No. 10 Family Office acquired the holding from Taiyo Pacific Chief Executive Officer Brian Heywood and other founding members, Nikkei reported Monday, citing executives from both parties involved that it didn’t identify. Hirowaka Murakami, co-chief investment officer of Yamauchi No. 10, will be named co-CEO along with Heywood later this month, Nikkei said. 

The family office declined to disclose the size of the deal but said it expects it to help expand its reach to both public and private markets in Japan, a media representative told Bloomberg.

“We’re very focused on ensuring that the spark of creativity never dies in Japan,” the spokesperson wrote in an email. “Taiyo will play an important role in our efforts to fulfill our obligation to use the assets we have inherited to achieve an innovative and enduring society.”

Banjo Yamauchi started the family office in 2020 to manage assets previously owned by former Nintendo President Hiroshi Yamauchi, who died in 2013. It oversees more than 100 billion yen ($867 million), Bloomberg reported in January of 2021, citing people with knowledge of the matter.

Kyoto-based Nintendo, which began in 1889 as a playing-card business, has since turned into a global video-game giant. The maker of the Switch console and creator of franchises including Mario and Pokemon now has a market value of more than $66 billion.

(Updates with family office comments in third and fourth paragraph)

More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com

©2022 Bloomberg L.P.

Fed Says Bank Director Contact ‘Routine’ as GOP Questions Raskin

(Bloomberg) — The Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City said it’s normal for its staff to communicate with directors of companies seeking access to the central bank’s payment system, after President Joe Biden’s nominee to be Fed vice chair for supervision came under fire from Republican lawmakers for her interactions with the regional institution.

“It is routine for the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City to communicate on an ongoing basis with a requesting organization, its management (including directors), public officials and any relevant federal or state regulatory counterparts,” the bank said in a statement on its website Monday.

During her confirmation hearing before the Senate Banking Committee last week, Raskin faced questions from Cynthia Lummis, a Wyoming Republican, about communicating with the Kansas City Fed regarding a Colorado-based fintech firm called Reserve Trust that received a master account — which allows access to the central bank’s payment system — while she was a director of that firm. Senator Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania, the Senate Banking Committee’s top Republican, made similar allegations in a set of questions for the nominee.

Raskin responded at the hearing by saying that “I want to make very clear that I have, first of all, had the honor to serve in various public capacities and each time I left I have been very mindful of the rules regarding departure.”

A White House spokesman said last week that Raskin had complied with ethics requirements, and that the GOP line of questions was innuendo and not backed up by facts.

The Kansas City Fed said Monday it had approved Reserve Trust’s request in 2018 — after initially rejecting it in 2017 — in part because the company “changed its business model” and Colorado regulators “reinterpreted the state’s law” in a way that meant the company “met the definition of a depository institution.”

More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com

©2022 Bloomberg L.P.

Amazon in Pact for Potential Stake in Sensor Maker Velodyne

(Bloomberg) — Velodyne Lidar Inc. shares more than doubled in late trading after Amazon.com Inc. acquired warrants that could lead to a stake in the auto-sensor maker.

Velodyne agreed to issue to Amazon a warrant to acquire more than 39 million shares or almost 16% of the company, according to a filing; the warrant shares will vest over time as Amazon makes payments to Velodyne.

It’s the latest example of Amazon seeking to invest in its business partners in order to benefit from upside associated with the relationship. Amazon in March invested $131 million for a minority stake of air cargo operator Air Transport Services Group Inc. On Thursday, Amazon announced its 2019 investment in electric automaker Rivian Automotive Inc. contributed an $11.8 billion net income gain in the quarter ended Dec. 31. Rivian had its initial public offering in November.

Velodyne is one of several startups that have gone public in the past two years by merging with so-called blank check companies, known as special purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs. Months after that transaction, investor Ford Motor Co. disclosed that it had sold off its stake in Velodyne, though it was still using the company’s technology. Through the close of regular trading Monday, the stock had slumped 84% over the past year as the frenzy over SPACs has worn off. 

Lidar, which stands for light detection and ranging, is a key technology as many of the the world’s leading automakers, tech companies and startups race to make fully autonomous cars a reality. Lidar uses lasers to build a three-dimensional image of the surrounding landscape, which is critical to how the vehicle perceives the environment, predicts the behavior of pedestrians and other vehicles, and plans how to safely navigate.

Amazon Spends $131 Million for Stake in Cargo Airline ATSG (2)

(Updates with previous Ford divestment in fourth paragraph. An earlier version corrected the potential percentage stake in second paragraph)

More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com

©2022 Bloomberg L.P.

Nvidia to Withdraw From Acquisition of SoftBank’s Arm

(Bloomberg) — Nvidia Corp. is abandoning its purchase of Arm Ltd. from SoftBank Group Corp., according to people familiar with the situation, bowing to regulatory opposition and ending what would have been the chip industry’s largest deal.

SoftBank now plans to proceed with an initial public offering of Arm, in lieu of the deal, according to the people, who asked not to be identified because the move isn’t yet public. The IPO is expected to happen in the fiscal year ending March 2023.

Arm Chief Executive Officer Simon Segars has resigned, handing the job to President Rene Haas, according to the people. The move wasn’t related to the demise of the deal, one of the people said. Segars was one of Arm’s first employees and worked his way up through the ranks to become CEO in 2013. He continued to lead the company after it was acquired by SoftBank in 2016.

The Financial Times reported earlier that the transaction collapsed on Monday. Last month, Bloomberg reported that Nvidia was preparing to wind down the deal. SoftBank and Arm are entitled to keep $2 billion that Nvidia paid at signing, including a $1.25 billion breakup fee.

Nvidia, Arm and SoftBank representatives declined to comment.

Nvidia announced the acquisition in September 2020, aiming to take control of chip technology that’s used in everything from phones to factory equipment. But the $40 billion transaction faced opposition from the start. Arm’s own customers scorned the idea, and regulators vowed to give it close scrutiny.

The purchase was dealt its most severe blow when the U.S. Federal Trade Commission sued to block it in December, arguing that Nvidia would gain too much control over chip designs used by the world’s biggest technology companies. The agreement also needed approval in the European Union and China, as well as the U.K., where Arm is based — none of which appeared poised to clear the transaction. 

Arm’s value has always been its neutrality, something that SoftBank, which doesn’t compete with any of the technology’s customers, was able to maintain. When Nvidia announced the deal, concerns grew that either its value would be destroyed by the change in ownership or opposition would scuttle its chances of getting signoff from governments around the world.

Bloomberg reported on Jan. 25 that Nvidia was quietly preparing to abandon the purchase. The Santa Clara, California-based company told partners that it didn’t expect the transaction to close. Still, some factions within the chipmaker had hoped to press ahead with a regulatory fight to win approval.

With the deal dead, SoftBank is now falling back on an earlier plan: an IPO. The route is unlikely to offer the same payday as the takeover offer, which had increased in value alongside the price of Nvidia’s shares. A run-up last year had added tens of billions of dollars to the transaction’s price tag.

SoftBank shares were little changed in Tokyo trading on Tuesday morning ahead of the company’s earnings report.

Arm’s designs and technology, which it licenses to companies that make their own chips, are the foundation of almost all of the world’s smartphones. They’re also making headway in personal computing, cars and data centers. Arm’s customers include Apple Inc., Amazon.com Inc.’s AWS and Alphabet Inc.’s Google, along with chipmakers that compete directly with Nvidia, such as Intel Corp. and Qualcomm Inc.

The troubled Arm deal hasn’t put much of a pall on Nvidia’s stock. Even after a recent tumble, it’s up more than 80% in the past 12 months. The company, which built its reputation making 3D graphics processors for video games, has been expanding into servers and other markets, helping turn it into the biggest U.S. chip company by market value. 

The failed deal also put a spotlight on tension between China and the U.S. over chips. The Asian nation is the biggest market for semiconductors, while America is home to the majority of the world’s chip companies by revenue. That gave the two countries divergent interests in examining the Arm acquisition. In the middle, the U.K. was faced with the possibility of its most famous technology asset shifting to U.S. control.

In the meantime, Arm has raised its ambitions. Over the past half-decade, the company has increased its workforce and investment in new technology, aiming to add capabilities that will let it make further inroads.

Nvidia had promised to keep Arm’s neutrality and pour in money. With that prospect gone, Arm faces life back in the public markets, where its spending and priorities may face fresh challenges.

(Updates with timing of IPO in second paragraph.)

More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com

©2022 Bloomberg L.P.

U.K. Plans to Force Pornography Websites to Verify Age of Users

(Bloomberg) — The U.K. government said it will force all websites that publish pornography to verify the age of their users as part of its Online Safety Bill.

Sites will be legally required to put “robust checks” in place to ensure users are 18 years old or over, the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport said on Tuesday in an emailed statement. That could include using technology to verify users possess a credit card, or getting a third-party service to confirm a person’s age against government data, it said. 

If websites fail to act, the independent regulator Ofcom will be able to fine them up to 10% of their annual global sales or block them in the U.K., the department said.

U.K. Adds Offenses to Online Safety Bill Targeting Big Tech

Lawmakers will vote on the legislation in the coming months. Last week the government said online platforms like Facebook owner Meta Platforms Inc. would be required to show how they pro-actively prevent harmful content from spreading. 

More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com

©2022 Bloomberg L.P.

KKR Leads $180 Million Round for Ikea-Backed Unicorn Livspace

(Bloomberg) — Livspace raised $180 million in a funding round led by KKR & Co. at a valuation of more than $1 billion as the online home interiors marketplace prepares to hunt for acquisitions in the Asia-Pacific region.

The Series F round also drew in existing investors including Ikea-parent Ingka Group Investments, Jungle Ventures, Venturi Partners and Peugeot Investments, the Singapore-based startup said in a statement on Tuesday.

The company, founded by Anuj Srivastava and Ramakant Sharma in 2015 to help consumers furnish homes, plans to use the fresh capital to invest in its core markets of India and Singapore and enter new regions. They include Southeast Asia, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Australia, Srivastava said in a video interview.

Livspace will also seek acquisition opportunities. The company recently acquired a majority stake in Qanvast, a Singapore-based home remodeling and design platform. In the Middle East, it has formed a joint venture with the Alsulaiman Group, Ikea’s operating partner in the region. Currently, about 80% of Livspace’s revenue comes from India.

A potential stock-market listing could happen in a few years, Srivastava said. “At this stage, we will continue to stay private and at the right time, we will look at where is the right place to take the company public,” he said.

For KKR, Livspace represents the latest in a series of deals intended to capitalize on Asia’s rising tech wave. Its Southeast Asian investments include Indonesian ride-hailing giant Gojek, online real estate marketplace PropertyGuru and KiotViet, a merchant platform for small and medium-sized enterprises.

The pandemic has triggered a surge in demand for interior remodeling platforms as people spend more time at home, said Srivastava, who is Livspace’s chief executive officer. The company connects customers with designers and vendors, and has about 350 in-house project managers.

Southeast Asia’s internet economy is set to double to $363 billion by 2025, becoming one of the world’s fastest-growing digital markets as millions of people in the region come online, according to a report by Google, Temasek Holdings and Bain & Co.

More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com

©2022 Bloomberg L.P.

Peter Thiel Is Finally Free to Go All-In on Far-Right Politics

(Bloomberg) — For years, even as Facebook came under increasing scrutiny from Washington politicians and regulators, the controversial billionaire Peter Thiel kept his seat on the company’s board, and, with it, his position as one of Silicon Valley’s most important power brokers. Now, Thiel is finally giving up that seat — one that he has held since 2005 — a move that will likely spare Meta Platforms Inc. from added political headaches. It will also allow Thiel to do what he has long signaled was a desire: to go all-in on far-right politics.

The investor and co-founder of PayPal Holdings Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc. has long seemed ambivalent about Facebook, a company where he was the first outside investor and a mentor to Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg. He sold much of his stock shortly after the company went public in 2012 and has been privately critical of the social network, even as he acted as an intermediary between Zuckerberg and then-President Donald Trump. (Thiel spoke at the 2016 Republican National Convention and served as a member of the presidential transition team.)

But the relationship between Thiel and Zuckerberg has grown chillier, especially over the last year, as Thiel has become a prominent supporter of political candidates who have added Zuckerberg to their lists of foes—targeting him alongside civil rights activists, democratic politicians, private equity executives and others they say are ruining America.

For example, Thiel is the largest donor to a political action committee supporting JD Vance, who previously worked at one of Thiel’s venture capital firms, and is now running for Senate in Ohio. Last summer the PAC aired a television ad in which Vance decried “a ruling class, an elite, who don’t actually care about the American nation,” as an image of Zuckerberg flashed across the screen. Thiel gave $10 million to the Vance PAC last March, according to Federal Election Commission filings. After Thiel, conservative megadonors Robert and Rebekah Mercer are the PAC’s second- and third-largest contributors, giving $100,000 and $50,000, respectively.

The $10 million donation to support Vance was by far the biggest single political contribution Thiel had ever made, but he has signaled a willingness to spend much more in the service of candidates aligned with Trump and the populist-nationalist movement that has sprung up around the former president. A month after giving to Vance, Thiel wrote a second $10 million check for a new PAC supporting the Arizona senate candidacy of Republican Blake Masters, who is a longtime Thiel aide and served as the cowriter on his book, Zero to One.

Like Vance, Masters has portrayed the tech industry, and Facebook, as a key adversary. He’s claimed — without evidence — that Facebook “threw the election for Biden” and has sought to connect the company to false claims, propagated by Trump and his allies, that the 2020 election was stolen. Thiel’s PAC, Saving Arizona, has amplified these messages, airing an ad that attacked one of Masters’ primary opponents, the current state attorney general Mark Brnovich, for certifying Biden’s election victory.

Read more: Peter Thiel Gamed Silicon Valley, Donald Trump, and Democracy to Make Billions, Tax-Free

Bloomberg News reported that a person close to Thiel said he’d left the board to avoid creating a distraction. He plans to focus on supporting Masters, Vance and other candidates with similar views. The move comes as Thiel has intensified his political engagement. In addition to the PAC donations, Thiel has held fundraisers for both Masters and Vance in recent months. In late December, Masters announced that he was minting a batch of 99 non-fungible tokens, or NFTs. They went on sale for $5,800, the maximum contribution allowed for an individual donor, and included the promise of “a piece of Zero to One history” (in jpeg form) and “exclusive access to parties with me and Peter,” among other perks. The promotion sold out, netting Masters about $575,000 for his campaign.

Thiel has also supported the campaign of Harriet Hageman, who is running to replace Wyoming representative Liz Cheney, one of a handful of Republicans to vote to impeach Trump after the failed insurrection on Jan. 6, 2021. Thiel donated $5,800 to Hageman in September, and last month hosted a fundraiser for Hageman in which he cast Cheney as “treasonous,” according to Politico’s Alex Isenstadt. “The way we’re going to defeat the left, the way we’re going to roll them back, it’s going to start in the Republican Party, that’s where we have some problems, we’ve got to clean house there first,” Thiel said, according to Isenstadt.

Zuckerberg has addressed Jan. 6 in starkly different terms. In Congressional testimony last year, he called the attack on the Capitol “an outrage,” and a “disgraceful moment in our history,” blaming former President Trump. By contrast, according to the person close to Thiel, his priority will be to advance the Trump agenda ahead of the November election.

More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com

©2022 Bloomberg L.P.

Pentagon Cyber Official Resigns After Security Clearance Dispute

(Bloomberg) — A Pentagon official who led a new cybersecurity initiative for defense contractors but was later placed on administrative leave after her security clearance was suspended has resigned, saying she was punished for political reasons. 

Katie Arrington, the chief information security officer for the Pentagon’s acquisition and sustainment office, informed the department’s top industrial affairs officials of her decision on Monday, according to her resignation letter made available to Bloomberg News.

Arrington is a former private sector cyber expert and Republican state representative from South Carolina who was brought into the Pentagon during the Trump administration under the category of “Highly Qualified Expert.” She later competed for and attained the nonpartisan Senior Executive Service status.

Her resignation came almost nine months after she was informed in May that her security clearance for access to classified information was being suspended as “a result of a reported Unauthorized Disclosure of Classified Information and subsequent removal of access by the National Security Agency,” according to a memo.

Arrington claimed that a formal “Statement of Reasons” for her clearance suspension that the Pentagon provided in December “is still non-descript and bereft of substantiating rationale or detail justifying my suspension.”

Trump-Era Pentagon Official Sues as Suspension Reaches 5 Months

The suspension was “in my perception, a politically influenced action driven to silence me because I was in the process of filing a Hostile Work Environment claim” against a current Pentagon official and she was “concurrently navigating issues of overreach” by the NSA’s Directorate of Cyber, Arrington said in her resignation letter.

Pentagon spokeswoman Jessica Maxwell didn’t provide immediate comment on the resignation letter.

Since May, Arrington has fought a legal battle to get full disclosure of the allegations against her and restoration of her security clearance. She counter-sued the Pentagon in October “due to the lack of evidence,” saying that she was “deprived of procedural and substantive due process,” the suit asserts.

Arrington settled the lawsuit last month, with the Pentagon paying attorney’s fees, according to her resignation letter. 

Her LinkedIn page says she left the Pentagon this month, and “Stay tuned.”

More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com

©2022 Bloomberg L.P.

UBS Group Hires Bank of Montreal’s Head Fintech Banker Dubroff

(Bloomberg) — UBS Group AG hired Bank of Montreal’s head of fintech investment banking Jonathan Dubroff, according to people with knowledge of the matter.

New York-based Dubroff will join UBS’s investment banking arm as head of payments, one of the people said, asking not to be identified discussing an appointment that isn’t yet public. He’ll join after a period of gardening leave, according to the people.

Dubroff and a representative for UBS both declined to comment. BMO didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Dubroff has worked at BMO since 2009, according to Finra records. He’s advised companies including Paysafe Group Plc, according to disclosures.

Another BMO banker, Yogesh Amle, left to join Credit Suisse Group AG, Bloomberg News reported last month.

More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com

©2022 Bloomberg L.P.

Close Bitnami banner
Bitnami